Volleyball Antennae (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Volleyball Antennae (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 0
- Closed in period
- 9
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 1 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 1 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 67%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- —
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 9 bids
based on 0 bids
based on 9 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Volleyball Pole (V2)74/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 90
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Volleyball Antennae (V2)73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Resistance Tube34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Sports and Gym Kit Bag34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volleyball Pole (V2) | 74 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Volleyball Antennae (V2) | 73 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 3 | Volleyball Net (V2) Conforming to IS 3345 | 71 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Volleyball (V3) Conforming to IS 417 | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Resistance Tube | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Sports and Gym Kit Bag | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Volleyball Pole (V2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 90
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Volleyball Antennae (V2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volleyball Pole (V2) | 100 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Volleyball Antennae (V2) | 100 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 3 | Volleyball Net (V2) Conforming to IS 3345 | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Department of Sports38/100
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sports Youth and Cultural Activities Department Gujarat | 63 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Sports and Youth Affairs Department Haryana | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Military Affairs | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Sports | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Panchayati Raj Department Odisha | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Gujarat63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Haryana57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Assam37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Odisha37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Tamil Nadu37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gujarat | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Haryana | 57 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Assam | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Odisha | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Tamil Nadu | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Panchkula64/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Banaskantha55/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Sonitpur44/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ahmedabad44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Jamnagar44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Vadodara44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Koraput44/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Nagapattinam44/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panchkula | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Banaskantha | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Sonitpur | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ahmedabad | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Jamnagar | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Vadodara | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Koraput | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Nagapattinam | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.