Tree Guard (V3): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Tree Guard (V3) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 9
- Closed in period
- 150
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹14 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 6
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 19 |
| Jun 2026 | 33 |
| Jul 2026 | 27 |
| Aug 2026 | 17 |
| Sept 2026 | 36 |
| Oct 2026 | 16 |
| Nov 2026 | 7 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 22%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 1%
based on 155 bids
based on 8 bids
based on 153 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Tree Guard (V3)72/100
9 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹14 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Fruit Plants29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 14
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tree Guard (V3) | 72 | 9 | 150 | 6 | ₹14 lakh |
| 2 | Fruit Plants | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Tree Guard (V3)96/100
9 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹14 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tree Guard (V3) | 96 | 9 | 150 | 6 | ₹14 lakh |
- 1
6 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹14 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 91
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 43
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Department of Defence43/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forest Department Uttar Pradesh | 80 | 6 | 50 | 6 | ₹14 lakh |
| 2 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 66 | 2 | 29 | — | — |
| 3 | Forests and Environment Department Gujarat | 58 | 0 | 31 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Fertilizers | 53 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of School Education and Literacy | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Infrastructure and Industrial Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 7 | Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat | 47 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 8 | Forest Department Jammu and Kashmir | 47 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Defence | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Lsg (local Self Government) Rajasthan | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Education57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Home Affairs43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers | 63 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Education | 57 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh77/100
9 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 79
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 93
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 82
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Jharkhand50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jammu & Kashmir46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Arunachal Pradesh42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Chhattisgarh42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Madhya Pradesh42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Maharashtra42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Rajasthan42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Bihar32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 77 | 9 | 81 | — | — |
| 2 | Gujarat | 57 | 0 | 40 | — | — |
| 3 | Jharkhand | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Jammu & Kashmir | 46 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 5 | Arunachal Pradesh | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Chhattisgarh | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Madhya Pradesh | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Maharashtra | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Rajasthan | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Bihar | 32 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Sitapur74/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 88
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Sultanpur71/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 49
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 89
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Unnao71/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 88
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 80
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Bijnor71/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Pilibhit66/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gautam Buddha Nagar63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Surendra Nagar58/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 85
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Jammu58/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 85
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Bhavnagar56/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Banda56/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sitapur | 74 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Sultanpur | 71 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Unnao | 71 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Bijnor | 71 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Pilibhit | 66 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Gautam Buddha Nagar | 63 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Surendra Nagar | 58 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 8 | Jammu | 58 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 9 | Bhavnagar | 56 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 10 | Banda | 56 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.