Thread Locking Adhesive: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Thread Locking Adhesive on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 23
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 5 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | 5 |
| Sept 2026 | 1 |
| Oct 2026 | 1 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 83%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 23 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 24 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Thread Locking Adhesive73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Retaining Compound73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Silicon Sealent53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Thread sealant53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Anti-Seize Compound51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Cyanoacrylate Adhesive49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Metal Putty49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10M - Seal as per IS 919735/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thread Locking Adhesive | 73 | 1 | 23 | — | — |
| 2 | Retaining Compound | 73 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 3 | Silicon Sealent | 53 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 4 | Thread sealant | 53 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 5 | Anti-Seize Compound | 51 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 6 | Cyanoacrylate Adhesive | 49 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 7 | Metal Putty | 49 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 8 | Industrial Grade Heavy Duty Penetrating Oil (6030 Pen Oil) | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Adf (Air Drying Film) Lubricant-IS13796 | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | M - Seal as per IS 9197 | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Thread Locking Adhesive100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Retaining Compound100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Silicon Sealent100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Thread sealant100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Anti-Seize Compound100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Cyanoacrylate Adhesive100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Metal Putty100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thread Locking Adhesive | 100 | 1 | 23 | — | — |
| 2 | Retaining Compound | 100 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 3 | Silicon Sealent | 100 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 4 | Thread sealant | 100 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 5 | Anti-Seize Compound | 100 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 6 | Cyanoacrylate Adhesive | 100 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 7 | Metal Putty | 100 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
- 1Coal India Limited74/100
Ministry of Coal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways63/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coal India Limited | 74 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Atomic Energy | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Military Affairs | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Coal74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Railways63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Pmo63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Defence51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Coal | 74 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Railways | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Pmo | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Defence | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Maharashtra59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Madhya Pradesh57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Rajasthan56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Uttarakhand56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gujarat43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Karnataka43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Tamil Nadu43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Andhra Pradesh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Jharkhand37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Maharashtra | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Madhya Pradesh | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 4 | Rajasthan | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Uttarakhand | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Gujarat | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Karnataka | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Tamil Nadu | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Andhra Pradesh | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Jharkhand | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Dehradun63/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Surat49/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bangalore49/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Thane49/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Chittorgarh49/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Bareilly49/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Bulandshahr49/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Visakhapatnam40/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Bokaro40/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Chandrapur40/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dehradun | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Surat | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Bangalore | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Thane | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Chittorgarh | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Bareilly | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Bulandshahr | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Visakhapatnam | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Bokaro | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Chandrapur | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.