Tentage Service: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Tentage Service on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 3Awarded results: 6Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 3
Closed in period: 123
Awarded results: 6
Median winning price (L1): ₹9.1 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 3

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

8 Mar 2026

12 Apr 2026

9 May 2026

19 Jun 2026

2222 Jul 2026

12 Aug 2026

21 Sept 2026

20 Oct 2026

2 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	8
Apr 2026	12
May 2026	9
Jun 2026	19
Jul 2026	22
Aug 2026	12
Sept 2026	21
Oct 2026	20
Nov 2026	2

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 65%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 100%
Reverse auction: 2%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Tentage Service88/100
3 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
92
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100
2
Tentage Service Lumpsum Based41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Catering Service per Packet based32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Tentage Service	88	3	123	3	₹9.1 lakh
2	Tentage Service Lumpsum Based	41	0	3	—	—
3	Catering Service per Packet based	32	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Tentage Service Lumpsum Based100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Tentage Service94/100
3 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
92
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Tentage Service Lumpsum Based	100	0	3	—	—
2	Tentage Service	94	3	123	3	₹9.1 lakh

1
Department of Military Affairs71/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Agriculture Department Uttar Pradesh68/100
0 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹10 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
84
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Higher Education Department Uttar Pradesh65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of School Education and Literacy64/100
Ministry of Education ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
9
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Atomic Energy56/100
Pmo ·0 live · 1 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Revenue Department Uttar Pradesh52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Defence45/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Home Department Gujarat45/100
0 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹8.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Higher Education43/100
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	71	1	8	—	—
2	Agriculture Department Uttar Pradesh	68	0	10	3.5	₹10 lakh
3	Higher Education Department Uttar Pradesh	65	0	4	—	—
4	Department of School Education and Literacy	64	1	44	—	—
5	Department of Atomic Energy	56	0	3	1	₹2.5 lakh
6	Revenue Department Uttar Pradesh	52	0	11	—	—
7	Department of Defence	45	0	4	—	—
8	Home Department Gujarat	45	0	4	4	₹8.3 lakh
9	Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat	45	0	4	—	—
10	Department of Higher Education	43	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Education64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
9
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Pmo56/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Coal50/100
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.2 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Culture30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	73	1	12	—	—
2	Ministry of Education	64	1	47	—	—
3	Pmo	56	0	3	1	₹2.5 lakh
4	Ministry of Coal	50	0	1	3	₹9.2 lakh
5	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	33	0	2	—	—
6	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	30	0	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Culture	30	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
51
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Madhya Pradesh65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
84
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Chhattisgarh62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
22
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gujarat62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
28
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Maharashtra61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Karnataka53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Delhi51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Tamil Nadu48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jammu & Kashmir44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Telangana44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	73	1	32	—	—
2	Madhya Pradesh	65	0	5	—	—
3	Chhattisgarh	62	1	18	—	—
4	Gujarat	62	0	15	—	—
5	Maharashtra	61	0	10	—	—
6	Karnataka	53	0	10	—	—
7	Delhi	51	0	8	—	—
8	Tamil Nadu	48	0	5	—	—
9	Jammu & Kashmir	44	0	3	—	—
10	Telangana	44	0	3	—	—

1
Bastar73/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
84
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Meerut73/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
84
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Jamnagar71/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Bangalore63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Pune56/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Korba53/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Mumbai53/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Durg51/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Central Delhi51/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
South West Delhi51/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bastar	73	1	4	—	—
2	Meerut	73	0	5	—	—
3	Jamnagar	71	0	3	—	—
4	Bangalore	63	0	9	—	—
5	Pune	56	0	5	—	—
6	Korba	53	0	4	—	—
7	Mumbai	53	0	4	—	—
8	Durg	51	0	3	—	—
9	Central Delhi	51	0	3	—	—
10	South West Delhi	51	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

6 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers33%

of 3 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Tentage Service: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor