Telescopic Pole Pruner: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Telescopic Pole Pruner on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 0
- Closed in period
- 21
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 8 |
| Jul 2026 | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 |
| Sept 2026 | 1 |
| Oct 2026 | 2 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 81%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- —
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 21 bids
based on 0 bids
based on 21 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Telescopic Pole Pruner73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telescopic Pole Pruner | 73 | 0 | 21 | — | — |
| 2 | Telescopic Pole Pruner (V2) | 66 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | HEDGE TRIMMER or HEDGE CUTTER | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Telescopic Pole Pruner100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Telescopic Pole Pruner (V2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telescopic Pole Pruner | 100 | 0 | 21 | — | — |
| 2 | Telescopic Pole Pruner (V2) | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 75
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways78/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 94
- Momentum
- 88
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Department of Defence35/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Home Department Odisha35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 78 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 78 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 3 | Engineering Department Chandigarh | 41 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Gujarat Electricity Board (geb) - Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (guvnl) | 41 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Defence | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Urban Development Department Delhi | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Bhakra Beas Managemet Board | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Home Department Odisha | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Railways77/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 89
- Momentum
- 88
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Defence76/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 66
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Power34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Railways | 77 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Defence | 76 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Power | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Punjab63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bihar60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jammu & Kashmir60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Assam49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Chandigarh49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Delhi49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Gujarat49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Odisha49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Andhra Pradesh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Punjab | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Uttar Pradesh | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Bihar | 60 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Jammu & Kashmir | 60 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Assam | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Chandigarh | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Delhi | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Gujarat | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Odisha | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Andhra Pradesh | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Gaya64/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jammu64/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Chandigarh55/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Rajkot55/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Visakhapatnam44/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Dhemaji44/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Jorhat44/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8New Delhi44/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9North West Delhi44/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Sirsa44/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gaya | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Jammu | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Chandigarh | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Rajkot | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Visakhapatnam | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Dhemaji | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Jorhat | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | New Delhi | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | North West Delhi | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Sirsa | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.