Stacker (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Stacker (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 4
- Closed in period
- 38
- Awarded results
- 2
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹9.3 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 5 |
| Jun 2026 | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | 8 |
| Aug 2026 | 7 |
| Sept 2026 | 9 |
| Oct 2026 | 4 |
| Nov 2026 | 3 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 73%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 75%
- Reverse auction
- 3%
based on 40 bids
based on 4 bids
based on 40 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Stacker (V2)73/100
4 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Pallet Truck (V3)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 18
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stacker (V2) | 73 | 4 | 38 | 5 | ₹9.3 lakh |
| 2 | Pallet Truck (V3) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Stacker (V2)100/100
4 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.3 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stacker (V2) | 100 | 4 | 38 | 5 | ₹9.3 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·1 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 66
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Department of Space73/100
Department of Space ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Pmo ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Indian Railways53/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 76 | 1 | 15 | 5 | ₹9.3 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Space | 73 | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Atomic Energy | 67 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Indian Railways | 53 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Defence Production | 47 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Karnataka | 47 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Revenue and Disaster Department Chhattisgarh | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Medical Health and Family Welfare Department Uttar Pradesh | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence74/100
1 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 55
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Department of Space72/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Pmo66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Railways52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 74 | 1 | 18 | 5 | ₹9.3 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Space | 72 | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Pmo | 66 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Railways | 52 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Karnataka74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 58
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kerala74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Rajasthan74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Telangana74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gujarat62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Tamil Nadu62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Chhattisgarh60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Maharashtra57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Andhra Pradesh54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karnataka | 74 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Kerala | 74 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Rajasthan | 74 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Telangana | 74 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Uttar Pradesh | 63 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 6 | Gujarat | 62 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Tamil Nadu | 62 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Chhattisgarh | 60 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 9 | Maharashtra | 57 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 10 | Andhra Pradesh | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Thiruvananthapuram83/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Coimbatore69/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Jamnagar60/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jodhpur60/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Hyderabad60/100
Telangana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Durg49/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Raipur49/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Uttara Kannada49/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Mumbai49/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Lucknow49/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thiruvananthapuram | 83 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Coimbatore | 69 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Jamnagar | 60 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Jodhpur | 60 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Hyderabad | 60 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Durg | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Raipur | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Uttara Kannada | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Mumbai | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Lucknow | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
2 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.