Smartphones (V3): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Smartphones (V3) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 12Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 12
Closed in period: 98
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

13 May 2026

15 Jun 2026

20 Jul 2026

2525 Aug 2026

14 Sept 2026

20 Oct 2026

3 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	13
Jun 2026	15
Jul 2026	20
Aug 2026	25
Sept 2026	14
Oct 2026	20
Nov 2026	3

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 71%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 17%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Smartphones (V3)73/100
12 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Tablet Computer (V2)41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Smartphones (V3)	73	12	98	—	—
2	Tablet Computer (V2)	41	0	3	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Smartphones (V3)100/100
12 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Tablet Computer (V2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Smartphones (V3)	100	12	98	—	—
2	Tablet Computer (V2)	100	0	3	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs69/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
34
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Indian Railways66/100
Ministry of Railways ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
32
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Coal India Limited64/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Energy Department Uttar Pradesh64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Electronics and Information Technology60/100
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Posts56/100
Ministry of Communications ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Space55/100
Department of Space ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh Affairs55/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Higher Education Department Kerala55/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Home Department Andhra Pradesh55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	69	0	24	—	—
2	Indian Railways	66	2	15	—	—
3	Coal India Limited	64	0	3	—	—
4	Energy Department Uttar Pradesh	64	0	3	—	—
5	Department of Electronics and Information Technology	60	0	5	—	—
6	Department of Posts	56	1	2	—	—
7	Department of Space	55	1	1	—	—
8	Department of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh Affairs	55	1	1	—	—
9	Higher Education Department Kerala	55	2	0	—	—
10	Home Department Andhra Pradesh	55	1	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
28
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Railways65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
87
Momentum
31
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Coal63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Home Affairs59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Communications59/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Civil Aviation55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Space55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Power31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	68	0	29	—	—
2	Ministry of Railways	65	2	16	—	—
3	Ministry of Coal	63	0	3	—	—
4	Ministry of Home Affairs	59	1	4	—	—
5	Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology	59	0	5	—	—
6	Ministry of Communications	59	2	2	—	—
7	Ministry of Civil Aviation	55	1	1	—	—
8	Department of Space	55	1	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	31	0	1	—	—
10	Ministry of Power	31	0	1	—	—

1
Kerala74/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gujarat69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
24
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Jammu & Kashmir66/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
61
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Odisha64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Andhra Pradesh61/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
69
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Bihar60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Uttarakhand60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Delhi49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kerala	74	4	5	—	—
2	Gujarat	69	1	4	—	—
3	Maharashtra	68	1	6	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	67	1	22	—	—
5	Jammu & Kashmir	66	2	7	—	—
6	Odisha	64	0	3	—	—
7	Andhra Pradesh	61	1	3	—	—
8	Bihar	60	0	5	—	—
9	Uttarakhand	60	1	4	—	—
10	Delhi	49	0	5	—	—

1
Jammu76/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Mumbai69/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Sambalpur69/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Moradabad67/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Patna67/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
69
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Thiruvananthapuram67/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
69
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Lucknow63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ahmedabad59/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jamnagar59/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Kollam59/100
Kerala ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jammu	76	2	4	—	—
2	Mumbai	69	0	3	—	—
3	Sambalpur	69	0	3	—	—
4	Moradabad	67	1	4	—	—
5	Patna	67	0	4	—	—
6	Thiruvananthapuram	67	1	3	—	—
7	Lucknow	63	0	9	—	—
8	Ahmedabad	59	1	1	—	—
9	Jamnagar	59	0	2	—	—
10	Kollam	59	2	0	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Smartphones (V3): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor