Sheep Blood Agar Plate: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Sheep Blood Agar Plate on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 3Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 3
Closed in period: 13
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

1 Jul 2026

3 Aug 2026

55 Sept 2026

3 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	1
Aug 2026	3
Sept 2026	5
Oct 2026	3
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 80%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 7%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Sheep Blood Agar Plate73/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Fraser Broth37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Modified Charcoal Cefoperazone Deoxycholate Agar (MCCD)37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Tryptone Soya Yeast Extract Agar37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Hektoen Enteric Agar32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Xylose lysine deoxycholate agar32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Sheep Blood Agar Plate	73	3	13	—	—
2	Fraser Broth	37	0	2	—	—
3	Modified Charcoal Cefoperazone Deoxycholate Agar (MCCD)	37	0	2	—	—
4	Tryptone Soya Yeast Extract Agar	37	0	2	—	—
5	Hektoen Enteric Agar	32	0	1	—	—
6	Xylose lysine deoxycholate agar	32	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Sheep Blood Agar Plate100/100
3 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Sheep Blood Agar Plate	100	3	13	—	—

1
Employees State Insuarnce Corporation80/100
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
89
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Atomic Energy63/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Health and Family Welfare60/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Commerce49/100
Ministry of Commerce and Industry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Military Affairs40/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Employees State Insuarnce Corporation	80	1	2	—	—
2	Department of Defence	63	0	3	—	—
3	Department of Atomic Energy	63	0	3	—	—
4	Department of Health and Family Welfare	60	1	0	—	—
5	Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi	60	1	0	—	—
6	Department of Commerce	49	0	2	—	—
7	Department of Military Affairs	40	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Labour and Employment73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Pmo56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Commerce and Industry43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Labour and Employment	73	1	4	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	59	0	4	—	—
3	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	57	1	0	—	—
4	Pmo	56	0	3	—	—
5	Ministry of Commerce and Industry	43	0	2	—	—

1
Delhi73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
89
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Telangana69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Odisha60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Gujarat49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Karnataka40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kerala40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Tamil Nadu40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Uttar Pradesh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Uttarakhand40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Delhi	73	1	2	—	—
2	Telangana	69	1	1	—	—
3	Maharashtra	63	0	3	—	—
4	Odisha	60	1	0	—	—
5	Gujarat	49	0	2	—	—
6	Karnataka	40	0	1	—	—
7	Kerala	40	0	1	—	—
8	Tamil Nadu	40	0	1	—	—
9	Uttar Pradesh	40	0	1	—	—
10	Uttarakhand	40	0	1	—	—

1
Mumbai63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
North West Delhi60/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ahmedabad49/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
North Delhi40/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
South Delhi40/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bangalore40/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kollam40/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Chennai40/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Hyderabad40/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Varanasi40/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Mumbai	63	0	3	—	—
2	North West Delhi	60	1	0	—	—
3	Ahmedabad	49	0	2	—	—
4	North Delhi	40	0	1	—	—
5	South Delhi	40	0	1	—	—
6	Bangalore	40	0	1	—	—
7	Kollam	40	0	1	—	—
8	Chennai	40	0	1	—	—
9	Hyderabad	40	0	1	—	—
10	Varanasi	40	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Sheep Blood Agar Plate: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor