Sanitary Napkins Vending Machines: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Sanitary Napkins Vending Machines on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 11Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 11
Closed in period: 261
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

7 Mar 2026

14 Apr 2026

15 May 2026

9595 Jun 2026

38 Jul 2026

21 Aug 2026

53 Sept 2026

26 Oct 2026

2 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	7
Apr 2026	14
May 2026	15
Jun 2026	95
Jul 2026	38
Aug 2026	21
Sept 2026	53
Oct 2026	26
Nov 2026	2

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 91%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 9%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Sanitary Napkins Vending Machines72/100
11 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Sanitary Napkins Incinetator Machine with Smoke Control Unit70/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
93
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Sanitary Napkins Vending Machines	72	11	261	—	—
2	Sanitary Napkins Incinetator Machine with Smoke Control Unit	70	6	179	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Sanitary Napkins Vending Machines100/100
11 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Sanitary Napkins Incinetator Machine with Smoke Control Unit99/100
6 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
93
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Sanitary Napkins Vending Machines	100	11	261	—	—
2	Sanitary Napkins Incinetator Machine with Smoke Control Unit	99	6	179	—	—

1
Rural Development Department Bihar79/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
91
Momentum
96
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Panchayat Raj Department Bihar67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Panchayati Raj65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
10
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Education Department Andaman & Nicobar52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Military Affairs49/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Higher Education Madhya Pradesh49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Urban Development Department49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
School Education Department Uttarakhand49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Social Welfare Department Bihar49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Rural Development Department Bihar	79	6	65	—	—
2	Panchayat Raj Department Bihar	67	0	46	—	—
3	Department of Panchayati Raj	65	1	107	—	—
4	Education Department Andaman & Nicobar	52	0	2	—	—
5	Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh	50	0	14	—	—
6	Department of Military Affairs	49	0	1	—	—
7	Department of Higher Education Madhya Pradesh	49	1	0	—	—
8	Urban Development Department	49	1	0	—	—
9	School Education Department Uttarakhand	49	0	1	—	—
10	Social Welfare Department Bihar	49	1	0	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Law and Justice55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Power44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Pmo44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	64	1	—	—
2	Ministry of Law and Justice	55	2	—	—
3	Ministry of Power	44	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways	44	1	—	—
5	Pmo	44	1	—	—

1
Bihar72/100
8 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Madhya Pradesh61/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
57
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
35
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Andaman & Nicobar51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Uttarakhand51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Odisha44/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Chhattisgarh31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Assam29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Haryana29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bihar	72	8	218	—	—
2	Madhya Pradesh	61	1	3	—	—
3	Maharashtra	57	1	9	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	55	0	16	—	—
5	Andaman & Nicobar	51	0	2	—	—
6	Uttarakhand	51	0	2	—	—
7	Odisha	44	1	6	—	—
8	Chhattisgarh	31	0	2	—	—
9	Assam	29	0	1	—	—
10	Haryana	29	0	1	—	—

1
Sitamarhi77/100
Bihar ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
72
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
East Champaran75/100
Bihar ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Begusarai67/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Saran64/100
Bihar ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Purnia63/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
71
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Darbhanga61/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
93
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Madhepura56/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Samastipur53/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Madhubani50/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jamui48/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Sitamarhi	77	2	53	—	—
2	East Champaran	75	4	20	—	—
3	Begusarai	67	0	6	—	—
4	Saran	64	1	3	—	—
5	Purnia	63	0	8	—	—
6	Darbhanga	61	0	42	—	—
7	Madhepura	56	0	24	—	—
8	Samastipur	53	0	14	—	—
9	Madhubani	50	0	9	—	—
10	Jamui	48	0	7	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Sanitary Napkins Vending Machines: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor