Safes (V3) ISI Marked to IS 550: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Safes (V3) ISI Marked to IS 550 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 59Awarded results: 24Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 59
Closed in period: 1,833
Awarded results: 24
Median winning price (L1): ₹16 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 3.7

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

59 Mar 2026

179 Apr 2026

223 May 2026

260 Jun 2026

379379 Jul 2026

278 Aug 2026

287 Sept 2026

192 Oct 2026

35 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	59
Apr 2026	179
May 2026	223
Jun 2026	260
Jul 2026	379
Aug 2026	278
Sept 2026	287
Oct 2026	192
Nov 2026	35

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 76%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 9%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Safes (V3) ISI Marked to IS 55087/100
59 live · 3.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
87
Easy criteria
99
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Safes (V3) ISI Marked to IS 550	87	59	1,833	3.7	₹16 lakh

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Safes (V3) ISI Marked to IS 55091/100
59 live · 3.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
87
Easy criteria
99
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Safes (V3) ISI Marked to IS 550	91	59	1,833	3.7	₹16 lakh

1
Department of Financial Services86/100
Ministry of Finance ·39 live · 3.6 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
49
Low competition
87
Easy criteria
100
Order value
93
2
Banking Sector81/100
Ministry of Finance ·20 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹45 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
84
Momentum
49
Low competition
85
Easy criteria
98
Order value
100
3
Regional Rural Banks62/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Home Department Gujarat51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Home Department Kerala48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Commercial Tax and Excise Department Department Chhattisgarh38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Heavy Industry28/100
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Posts28/100
Ministry of Communications ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Finance Department Assam28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Farrukhabad28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Financial Services	86	39	1,379	3.6	₹16 lakh
2	Banking Sector	81	20	430	4	₹45 lakh
3	Regional Rural Banks	62	0	10	—	—
4	Home Department Gujarat	51	0	3	—	—
5	Home Department Kerala	48	0	1	—	—
6	Commercial Tax and Excise Department Department Chhattisgarh	38	0	3	—	—
7	Department of Heavy Industry	28	0	1	—	—
8	Department of Posts	28	0	1	—	—
9	Finance Department Assam	28	0	1	—	—
10	Farrukhabad	28	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Finance87/100
59 live · 3.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
87
Easy criteria
99
Order value
100
2
Ministry of Communications28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
9
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
9
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
9
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Finance	87	59	1,819	3.7	₹16 lakh
2	Ministry of Communications	28	0	1	—	—
3	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	28	0	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	28	0	1	—	—

1
Rajasthan75/100
12 live · 4 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
92
Momentum
76
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Odisha71/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Karnataka71/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Telangana69/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
66
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Uttar Pradesh68/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
29
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Tamil Nadu67/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
60
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Punjab66/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
47
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Maharashtra65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
75
Momentum
51
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Kerala65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Madhya Pradesh64/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
60
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Rajasthan	75	12	229	4	—
2	Odisha	71	5	40	—	—
3	Karnataka	71	4	32	—	—
4	Telangana	69	3	89	—	—
5	Uttar Pradesh	68	5	372	—	—
6	Tamil Nadu	67	4	88	—	—
7	Punjab	66	2	115	—	—
8	Maharashtra	65	2	82	—	—
9	Kerala	65	0	47	—	—
10	Madhya Pradesh	64	2	49	—	—

1
Jodhpur75/100
Rajasthan ·8 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
75
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Lucknow70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Etawah70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gorakhpur70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Kota69/100
Rajasthan ·1 live · 4 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ernakulam69/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Bathinda69/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Mumbai68/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
80
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Sambalpur68/100
Odisha ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jhalawar68/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jodhpur	75	8	30	—	—
2	Lucknow	70	0	18	—	—
3	Etawah	70	0	16	—	—
4	Gorakhpur	70	1	15	—	—
5	Kota	69	1	16	4	—
6	Ernakulam	69	0	13	—	—
7	Bathinda	69	0	13	—	—
8	Mumbai	68	1	22	—	—
9	Sambalpur	68	3	11	—	—
10	Jhalawar	68	0	12	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

3 wins
2 wins
2 wins
2 wins
2 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

18 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers25%

of 4 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Safes (V3) ISI Marked to IS 550: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor