Random Access Memory (RAM) Module: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Random Access Memory (RAM) Module on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 4Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 4
Closed in period: 47
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

0 May 2026

9 Jun 2026

9 Jul 2026

11 Aug 2026

7 Sept 2026

1414 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	0
Jun 2026	9
Jul 2026	9
Aug 2026	11
Sept 2026	7
Oct 2026	14
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 82%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 50%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Random Access Memory (RAM) Module73/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Internal Storage Device (SSD/HDD) (V2)63/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Random Access Memory (RAM) Module	73	4	47	—	—
2	Internal Storage Device (SSD/HDD) (V2)	63	2	7	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Random Access Memory (RAM) Module100/100
4 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Internal Storage Device (SSD/HDD) (V2)100/100
2 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Random Access Memory (RAM) Module	100	4	47	—	—
2	Internal Storage Device (SSD/HDD) (V2)	100	2	7	—	—

1
Department of Defence Production70/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
98
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Atomic Energy67/100
Pmo ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Military Affairs65/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
14
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Space60/100
Department of Space ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
98
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Higher Education53/100
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Indian Railways53/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Central Police Organisation53/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ports and Transport Department Gujarat53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Defence Production	70	0	4	—	—
2	Department of Atomic Energy	67	1	5	—	—
3	Department of Military Affairs	65	0	14	—	—
4	Department of Space	60	0	4	—	—
5	Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh	57	1	1	—	—
6	Department of Higher Education	53	0	3	—	—
7	Indian Railways	53	0	1	—	—
8	Central Police Organisation	53	0	1	—	—
9	Ports and Transport Department Gujarat	53	0	1	—	—
10	Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla	53	1	0	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence69/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
33
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Pmo65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Space59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Education52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Home Affairs52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Railways52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Communications36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Finance32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Science and Technology32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	69	0	18	—	—
2	Pmo	65	1	5	—	—
3	Department of Space	59	0	4	—	—
4	Ministry of Education	52	0	3	—	—
5	Ministry of Home Affairs	52	0	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Railways	52	0	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Communications	36	0	2	—	—
8	Ministry of Finance	32	0	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises	32	0	1	—	—
10	Ministry of Science and Technology	32	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh80/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
89
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gujarat69/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
84
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Haryana58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
98
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Himachal Pradesh58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
98
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Tamil Nadu58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
98
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Karnataka56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Delhi53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Odisha53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Uttarakhand53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	80	2	9	—	—
2	Gujarat	69	0	6	—	—
3	Maharashtra	58	0	7	—	—
4	Haryana	58	0	2	—	—
5	Himachal Pradesh	58	1	1	—	—
6	Tamil Nadu	58	0	2	—	—
7	Karnataka	56	0	6	—	—
8	Delhi	53	0	1	—	—
9	Odisha	53	1	0	—	—
10	Uttarakhand	53	0	1	—	—

1
Lucknow83/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kurukshetra65/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
98
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bulandshahr65/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ahmedabad64/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bangalore63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Gwalior58/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ghaziabad58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
South Delhi58/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Junagadh58/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Shimla58/100
Himachal Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Lucknow	83	1	3	—	—
2	Kurukshetra	65	0	2	—	—
3	Bulandshahr	65	1	1	—	—
4	Ahmedabad	64	0	3	—	—
5	Bangalore	63	0	4	—	—
6	Gwalior	58	0	3	—	—
7	Ghaziabad	58	0	3	—	—
8	South Delhi	58	0	1	—	—
9	Junagadh	58	0	1	—	—
10	Shimla	58	1	0	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Random Access Memory (RAM) Module: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor