Punched Tape Concertina Coils - PTCC (V2): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Punched Tape Concertina Coils - PTCC (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 5Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 5
Closed in period: 30
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

4 Mar 2026

7 Apr 2026

99 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

2 Jul 2026

2 Aug 2026

3 Sept 2026

3 Oct 2026

3 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	4
Apr 2026	7
May 2026	9
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	2
Aug 2026	2
Sept 2026	3
Oct 2026	3
Nov 2026	3

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 37%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 60%
Reverse auction: 9%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Punched Tape Concertina Coils - PTCC (V2)73/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Hand saw34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
31
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Punched Tape Concertina Coils - PTCC (V2)	73	5	30	—	—
2	Hand saw	34	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Punched Tape Concertina Coils - PTCC (V2)100/100
5 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Punched Tape Concertina Coils - PTCC (V2)	100	5	30	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs72/100
Ministry of Defence ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
83
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Prisons Administration and Reforms Department Uttar Pradesh67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
21
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Central Armed Police Forces54/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Revenue53/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Home Department Chhattisgarh48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Social Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Forest Department Chhattisgarh33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	72	2	5	—	—
2	Prisons Administration and Reforms Department Uttar Pradesh	67	1	13	—	—
3	Central Armed Police Forces	54	0	6	—	—
4	Department of Revenue	53	0	1	—	—
5	Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat	53	1	0	—	—
6	Home Department Chhattisgarh	48	0	3	—	—
7	Social Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir	33	0	1	—	—
8	Forest Department Chhattisgarh	33	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence79/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
83
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Home Affairs61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Finance55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	79	2	5	—	—
2	Ministry of Home Affairs	61	0	6	—	—
3	Ministry of Finance	55	0	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways	55	1	0	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
21
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Rajasthan60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gujarat53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Haryana53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Maharashtra53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jammu & Kashmir52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Chhattisgarh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Assam48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Punjab37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Manipur33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	67	1	13	—	—
2	Rajasthan	60	1	2	—	—
3	Gujarat	53	1	0	—	—
4	Haryana	53	1	0	—	—
5	Maharashtra	53	1	0	—	—
6	Jammu & Kashmir	52	0	5	—	—
7	Chhattisgarh	50	0	4	—	—
8	Assam	48	0	3	—	—
9	Punjab	37	0	2	—	—
10	Manipur	33	0	1	—	—

1
Kamrup63/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Banda63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Anand60/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ambala60/100
Haryana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Raigad60/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jaipur60/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kota60/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Lucknow60/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Baramulla49/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jalandhar49/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kamrup	63	0	3	—	—
2	Banda	63	0	3	—	—
3	Anand	60	1	0	—	—
4	Ambala	60	1	0	—	—
5	Raigad	60	1	0	—	—
6	Jaipur	60	1	0	—	—
7	Kota	60	0	1	—	—
8	Lucknow	60	1	0	—	—
9	Baramulla	49	0	2	—	—
10	Jalandhar	49	0	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Punched Tape Concertina Coils - PTCC (V2): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor