Power Tiller: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Power Tiller on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 32
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

5 Mar 2026

2 Apr 2026

4 May 2026

1 Jun 2026

4 Jul 2026

88 Aug 2026

3 Sept 2026

5 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	5
Apr 2026	2
May 2026	4
Jun 2026	1
Jul 2026	4
Aug 2026	8
Sept 2026	3
Oct 2026	5
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 53%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Power Tiller73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Self Propelled Reaper46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Television (V3)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Seed Drill31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Power sprayer31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Self Propelled Weeder31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Power Tiller	73	32	—	—
2	Self Propelled Reaper	46	4	—	—
3	Television (V3)	31	1	—	—
4	Seed Drill	31	1	—	—
5	Power sprayer	31	1	—	—
6	Self Propelled Weeder	31	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Power Tiller100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Self Propelled Reaper100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Power Tiller	100	0	32	—	—
2	Self Propelled Reaper	100	0	4	—	—

1
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)83/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Skuast Kashmir71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Agriculture Marketing and Export Department Uttar Pradesh57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying54/100
Ministry of Fisheries Animal Husbandry Dairying ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Agriculture Department Assam40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Agriculture and Bio Technology40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Steel Authority of India Limited34/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Atomic Energy34/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Education Department Gujarat34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)	83	8	—	—
2	Skuast Kashmir	71	3	—	—
3	Agriculture Marketing and Export Department Uttar Pradesh	57	5	—	—
4	Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying	54	1	—	—
5	Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat	40	2	—	—
6	Agriculture Department Assam	40	2	—	—
7	Department of Agriculture and Bio Technology	40	2	—	—
8	Steel Authority of India Limited	34	1	—	—
9	Department of Atomic Energy	34	1	—	—
10	Education Department Gujarat	34	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare83/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Fisheries Animal Husbandry Dairying54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Pmo34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Ayush34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Steel34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	83	8	—	—
2	Ministry of Fisheries Animal Husbandry Dairying	54	1	—	—
3	Pmo	34	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Ayush	34	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Steel	34	1	—	—

1
Gujarat78/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jammu & Kashmir72/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
80
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Odisha59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Assam51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Chhattisgarh39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Maharashtra39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Andhra Pradesh34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Karnataka34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Tamil Nadu34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Gujarat	78	6	—	—
2	Jammu & Kashmir	72	5	—	—
3	Uttar Pradesh	63	9	—	—
4	Odisha	59	2	—	—
5	Assam	51	3	—	—
6	Chhattisgarh	39	2	—	—
7	Maharashtra	39	2	—	—
8	Andhra Pradesh	34	1	—	—
9	Karnataka	34	1	—	—
10	Tamil Nadu	34	1	—	—

1
Junagadh83/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Srinagar76/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Lucknow59/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Koraput57/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bongaigaon43/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Dantewada43/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ananthnag43/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Srikakulam37/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Kamrup37/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Vadodara37/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Junagadh	83	5	—	—
2	Srinagar	76	3	—	—
3	Lucknow	59	4	—	—
4	Koraput	57	1	—	—
5	Bongaigaon	43	2	—	—
6	Dantewada	43	2	—	—
7	Ananthnag	43	2	—	—
8	Srikakulam	37	1	—	—
9	Kamrup	37	1	—	—
10	Vadodara	37	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Power Tiller: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor