Portable Vein Viewing Device: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Portable Vein Viewing Device on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 15
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

0 May 2026

44 Jun 2026

4 Jul 2026

4 Aug 2026

2 Sept 2026

0 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	0
Jun 2026	4
Jul 2026	4
Aug 2026	4
Sept 2026	2
Oct 2026	0
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 60%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Portable Vein Viewing Device73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Acoustic Binaural Stethoscope (V3)43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Portable Vein Viewing Device	73	0	15	—	—
2	Acoustic Binaural Stethoscope (V3)	43	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Portable Vein Viewing Device100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Portable Vein Viewing Device	100	0	15	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs73/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Defence69/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Indian Railways47/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Health and Family Welfare Department Mizoram47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Materials47/100
Ministry of Mines ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Health and Family Welfare Department Odisha47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	73	5	—	—
2	Department of Defence	69	4	—	—
3	Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh	53	2	—	—
4	Indian Railways	47	1	—	—
5	Health and Family Welfare Department Mizoram	47	1	—	—
6	Materials	47	1	—	—
7	Health and Family Welfare Department Odisha	47	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Railways44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Mines44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	73	9	—	—
2	Ministry of Railways	44	1	—	—
3	Ministry of Mines	44	1	—	—

1
Kerala73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Odisha59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Rajasthan59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bihar50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Chhattisgarh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Gujarat50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Himachal Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Mizoram50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Telangana50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kerala	73	3	—	—
2	Odisha	59	2	—	—
3	Rajasthan	59	2	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	59	2	—	—
5	Bihar	50	1	—	—
6	Chhattisgarh	50	1	—	—
7	Gujarat	50	1	—	—
8	Himachal Pradesh	50	1	—	—
9	Mizoram	50	1	—	—
10	Telangana	50	1	—	—

1
Koraput65/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jodhpur65/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Lucknow65/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Patna54/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Raipur54/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Vadodara54/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Solan54/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Kollam54/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Pathanamthitta54/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Thiruvananthapuram54/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Koraput	65	2	—	—
2	Jodhpur	65	2	—	—
3	Lucknow	65	2	—	—
4	Patna	54	1	—	—
5	Raipur	54	1	—	—
6	Vadodara	54	1	—	—
7	Solan	54	1	—	—
8	Kollam	54	1	—	—
9	Pathanamthitta	54	1	—	—
10	Thiruvananthapuram	54	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Portable Vein Viewing Device: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor