Passive Night Vision Binocular as per MHA QR (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Passive Night Vision Binocular as per MHA QR (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 33
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹11 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 8 |
| Aug 2026 | 4 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 6 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 36%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 3%
based on 31 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 31 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
1 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹11 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2binocular44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Passive Night Vision Binocular as per MHA QR (V2) | 73 | 1 | 33 | 3 | ₹11 lakh |
| 2 | binocular | 44 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Passive Night Vision Monocular as per MHA QR (V2) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
1 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹11 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2binocular100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Passive Night Vision Binocular as per MHA QR (V2) | 100 | 1 | 33 | 3 | ₹11 lakh |
| 2 | binocular | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Department of Defence71/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Defence ·0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹11 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 82
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Home Department Manipur54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Home Department Bihar40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Indian Railways34/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Defence | 71 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Military Affairs | 63 | 0 | 8 | 3 | ₹11 lakh |
| 3 | Department of Atomic Energy | 57 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 4 | Home Department Manipur | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Home Department Andhra Pradesh | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Home Department Maharashtra | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Home Department Bihar | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Central Armed Police Forces | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Indian Railways | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Defence Production | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence70/100
1 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹11 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 35
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Power61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Pmo53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Home Affairs33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Railways33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Department of Space33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 70 | 1 | 11 | 3 | ₹11 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Power | 61 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Pmo | 53 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Railways | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Space | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Karnataka78/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Gujarat58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jharkhand58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Rajasthan58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Andhra Pradesh58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Assam58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Manipur58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Bihar45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Madhya Pradesh45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karnataka | 78 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Maharashtra | 63 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Gujarat | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Jharkhand | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Rajasthan | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Andhra Pradesh | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Assam | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Manipur | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Bihar | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Madhya Pradesh | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Mumbai63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Guntur60/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Dhemaji60/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Dakshina Kannada60/100
Karnataka ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Imphal West60/100
Manipur ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Patna49/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Kachchh49/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Ranchi49/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Indore49/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Chittorgarh49/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mumbai | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Guntur | 60 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Dhemaji | 60 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Dakshina Kannada | 60 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Imphal West | 60 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Patna | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Kachchh | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Ranchi | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Indore | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Chittorgarh | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.