Octagonal Pole (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Octagonal Pole (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 66
- Closed in period
- 1,031
- Awarded results
- 20
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹18 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | 33 |
| Apr 2026 | 192 |
| May 2026 | 145 |
| Jun 2026 | 119 |
| Jul 2026 | 180 |
| Aug 2026 | 84 |
| Sept 2026 | 115 |
| Oct 2026 | 182 |
| Nov 2026 | 44 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 7%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 1%
based on 992 bids
based on 19 bids
based on 975 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Octagonal Pole (V2)88/100
66 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹18 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value
- 99
- 2
24 live · 2.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹19 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 80
- Momentum
- 56
- Low competition
- 94
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value
- 100
- 3
6 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5LED Garden Light (V2)48/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Octagonal Pole (V2) | 88 | 66 | 1,031 | 3 | ₹18 lakh |
| 2 | LED Luminaire For Road And Street Lights Conforming To IS 10322 (Part 5/Section 3) (V3) (Under BIS Scheme - II) | 83 | 24 | 245 | 2.8 | ₹19 lakh |
| 3 | XLPE Cable for Working Voltage up to and Including 1.1 KV Marked To IS 7098 (Part 1) | 68 | 6 | 35 | 1 | — |
| 4 | XLPE Cable, Working Voltage from 3.3 kV up to and including 33 kV (V2) ISI Marked to IS 7098 (Part 2) | 50 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | LED Garden Light (V2) | 48 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Solar (PV Module) Cooking System (IOCL) | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | LED Luminaire (Recessed Luminaire) (Ceiling Light) Conforming To IS 10322 (Part 5/Section 2) (V4) (Under BIS Scheme - II) | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Lighting Pole or Post and Hardware - Tubular Street Light Poles (V2) | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Controller for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
6 live · 1 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
24 live · 2.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹19 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 80
- Momentum
- 56
- Low competition
- 94
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value
- 100
- 3Octagonal Pole (V2)94/100
66 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹18 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value
- 99
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XLPE Cable for Working Voltage up to and Including 1.1 KV Marked To IS 7098 (Part 1) | 97 | 6 | 35 | 1 | — |
| 2 | LED Luminaire For Road And Street Lights Conforming To IS 10322 (Part 5/Section 3) (V3) (Under BIS Scheme - II) | 95 | 24 | 245 | 2.8 | ₹19 lakh |
| 3 | Octagonal Pole (V2) | 94 | 66 | 1,031 | 3 | ₹18 lakh |
- 1
50 live · 3.1 bidders avg · L1 ₹18 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 53
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value
- 100
- 2
10 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 66
- Momentum
- 73
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 72
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 41
- Momentum
- 38
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 6
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 6
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Indian Railways42/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Education Department Goa41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 88 | 50 | 798 | 3.1 | ₹18 lakh |
| 2 | Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat | 67 | 10 | 77 | 1 | — |
| 3 | Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat | 54 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Panchayati Raj | 53 | 0 | 15 | — | — |
| 5 | Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar | 51 | 0 | 46 | — | — |
| 6 | Rural Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 51 | 0 | 45 | — | — |
| 7 | Urban Development Directorate of Uttarakhand | 51 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Indian Railways | 42 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 9 | Education Department Goa | 41 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 10 | Sports and Youth Affairs Department Haryana | 40 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Railways63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Pmo60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Power40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Railways | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 2 | Pmo | 60 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Power | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh71/100
50 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹12 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 44
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat66/100
10 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Madhya Pradesh53/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 18
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Odisha52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 26
- Momentum
- 58
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Uttarakhand51/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Tamil Nadu50/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 41
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Bihar49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 36
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Maharashtra41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Chhattisgarh30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Puducherry30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 71 | 50 | 826 | 4 | ₹12 lakh |
| 2 | Gujarat | 66 | 10 | 96 | — | — |
| 3 | Madhya Pradesh | 53 | 2 | 46 | — | — |
| 4 | Odisha | 52 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Uttarakhand | 51 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Tamil Nadu | 50 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 7 | Bihar | 49 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 8 | Maharashtra | 41 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 9 | Chhattisgarh | 30 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Puducherry | 30 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Surat78/100
Gujarat ·8 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 93
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Basti77/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Kushinagar76/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Kaushambi75/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 93
- Momentum
- 72
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Faizabad74/100
Uttar Pradesh ·7 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gorakhpur73/100
Uttar Pradesh ·7 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 58
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Aligarh72/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 94
- Momentum
- 59
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Banda69/100
Uttar Pradesh ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 76
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Barabanki68/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 67
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Sant Kabir Nagar68/100
Uttar Pradesh ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 64
- Momentum
- 82
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Surat | 78 | 8 | 43 | — | — |
| 2 | Basti | 77 | 1 | 34 | — | — |
| 3 | Kushinagar | 76 | 0 | 26 | — | — |
| 4 | Kaushambi | 75 | 0 | 52 | — | — |
| 5 | Faizabad | 74 | 7 | 14 | — | — |
| 6 | Gorakhpur | 73 | 7 | 63 | — | — |
| 7 | Aligarh | 72 | 0 | 54 | — | — |
| 8 | Banda | 69 | 5 | 14 | — | — |
| 9 | Barabanki | 68 | 1 | 25 | — | — |
| 10 | Sant Kabir Nagar | 68 | 4 | 10 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 5 wins
- 3 wins
- 3 wins
- 2 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
11 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.