Mortuary Cabinet (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Mortuary Cabinet (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 48
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹5.4 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 4
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 10 |
| Aug 2026 | 8 |
| Sept 2026 | 12 |
| Oct 2026 | 7 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 40%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 48 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 48 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Mortuary Cabinet (V2)72/100
1 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Goniometer30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 18
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Skinfold Caliper (V2)30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 18
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mortuary Cabinet (V2) | 72 | 1 | 48 | 4 | ₹5.4 lakh |
| 2 | Goniometer | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Skinfold Caliper (V2) | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Mortuary Cabinet (V2)98/100
1 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.4 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mortuary Cabinet (V2) | 98 | 1 | 48 | 4 | ₹5.4 lakh |
- 1
1 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 47
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Department of Defence66/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 22
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 52
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 22
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 71 | 1 | 20 | 4 | ₹5.4 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Defence | 66 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat | 66 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Employees State Insuarnce Corporation | 52 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Health and Family Welfare Department Chhattisgarh | 48 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | Panchayat and Rural Development Department Madhya Pradesh | 46 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Department of Atomic Energy | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Maharashtra | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Higher Education | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence83/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Pmo45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Education38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 83 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Labour and Employment | 78 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Pmo | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Education | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh71/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 47
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Andhra Pradesh52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 22
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Madhya Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Chhattisgarh48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 52
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Karnataka36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kerala36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Haryana32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 22
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Telangana32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 22
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 71 | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2 | Gujarat | 71 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 3 | Andhra Pradesh | 52 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Madhya Pradesh | 50 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 50 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 6 | Chhattisgarh | 48 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Karnataka | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Kerala | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Haryana | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Telangana | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Rajkot65/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gorakhpur65/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Deoria63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Durg58/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ujjain58/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Siddharthnagar58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Guntur58/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Surat58/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Ballia58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Kachchh45/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajkot | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Gorakhpur | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Deoria | 63 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Durg | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Ujjain | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Siddharthnagar | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Guntur | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Surat | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Ballia | 58 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 10 | Kachchh | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.