Mobile Digital Radiography System (V2): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Mobile Digital Radiography System (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 10Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 10
Closed in period: 32
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

1 Dec 2025

1 Jan 2026

3 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

6 Apr 2026

4 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

2 Jul 2026

5 Aug 2026

4 Sept 2026

1010 Oct 2026

3 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	1
Jan 2026	1
Feb 2026	3
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	6
May 2026	4
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	2
Aug 2026	5
Sept 2026	4
Oct 2026	10
Nov 2026	3

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 13%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 80%
Reverse auction: 14%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Mobile Digital Radiography System (V2)72/100
10 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
94
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Digital Radiography System (V2)48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Mobile Digital Radiography System (V2)	72	10	32	—	—
2	Digital Radiography System (V2)	48	0	6	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Digital Radiography System (V2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Mobile Digital Radiography System (V2)94/100
10 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
94
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Digital Radiography System (V2)	100	0	6	—	—
2	Mobile Digital Radiography System (V2)	94	10	32	—	—

1
Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh80/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
92
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Medical Health and Family Welfare Department Uttar Pradesh70/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Animal Husbandary Fisheries and Dairy Development Department Punjab66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
44
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Health and Family Welfare62/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
44
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Health and Family Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
88
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
58
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Home57/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Health and Family Welfare Department Odisha42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh	80	3	2	—	—
2	Medical Health and Family Welfare Department Uttar Pradesh	70	2	2	—	—
3	Animal Husbandary Fisheries and Dairy Development Department Punjab	66	0	4	—	—
4	Department of Defence	63	0	6	—	—
5	Department of Health and Family Welfare	62	3	1	—	—
6	Health and Family Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir	62	1	1	—	—
7	Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat	59	0	2	—	—
8	Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi	58	1	2	—	—
9	Department of Home	57	0	4	—	—
10	Health and Family Welfare Department Odisha	42	0	2	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare62/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
44
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Home Affairs57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Labour and Employment36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Steel36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	63	0	6	—	—
2	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	62	3	1	—	—
3	Ministry of Home Affairs	57	0	4	—	—
4	Ministry of Labour and Employment	36	0	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Steel	36	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh79/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Delhi64/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
15
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
91
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Punjab60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
35
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Jammu & Kashmir58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Gujarat55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
88
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Tamil Nadu53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Chandigarh49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Odisha49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bihar38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Assam33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	79	5	4	—	—
2	Delhi	64	2	10	—	—
3	Punjab	60	0	5	—	—
4	Jammu & Kashmir	58	1	1	—	—
5	Gujarat	55	0	2	—	—
6	Tamil Nadu	53	1	0	—	—
7	Chandigarh	49	0	3	—	—
8	Odisha	49	1	2	—	—
9	Bihar	38	0	2	—	—
10	Assam	33	0	1	—	—

1
Lucknow83/100
Uttar Pradesh ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Bathinda65/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
35
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ananthnag61/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
New Delhi58/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ahmedabad58/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
88
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
West Delhi55/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Madurai55/100
Tamil Nadu ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Fatehpur55/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Mirzapur55/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Chandigarh53/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Lucknow	83	3	4	—	—
2	Bathinda	65	0	5	—	—
3	Ananthnag	61	1	1	—	—
4	New Delhi	58	0	5	—	—
5	Ahmedabad	58	0	2	—	—
6	West Delhi	55	1	0	—	—
7	Madurai	55	1	0	—	—
8	Fatehpur	55	1	0	—	—
9	Mirzapur	55	1	0	—	—
10	Chandigarh	53	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Mobile Digital Radiography System (V2): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor