Meat Mincer: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Meat Mincer on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 3Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 22
Awarded results: 3
Median winning price (L1): ₹65 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 8

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

5 Apr 2026

4 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

0 Jul 2026

3 Aug 2026

66 Sept 2026

2 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	5
May 2026	4
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	0
Aug 2026	3
Sept 2026	6
Oct 2026	2
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 32%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Meat Mincer78/100
0 live · 8 bidders avg · L1 ₹65 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition
54
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100
2
Stock Pot Stove42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
22
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Meat Mincer	78	0	22	8	₹65 lakh
2	Stock Pot Stove	42	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Meat Mincer68/100
0 live · 8 bidders avg · L1 ₹65 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition
54
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Meat Mincer	68	0	22	8	₹65 lakh

1
Department of Military Affairs78/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live · 8 bidders avg · L1 ₹65 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition
54
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100
2
Department of Defence42/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)42/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	78	19	8	₹65 lakh
2	Department of Defence	42	1	—	—
3	Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)	42	1	—	—
4	Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat	42	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence78/100
0 live · 8 bidders avg · L1 ₹65 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition
54
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100
2
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	78	0	20	8	₹65 lakh
2	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	42	0	1	—	—

1
Assam73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Uttar Pradesh73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Jammu & Kashmir68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Maharashtra55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Punjab55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Gujarat48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Himachal Pradesh48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Tamil Nadu48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Telangana48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Assam	73	4	—	—
2	Uttar Pradesh	73	4	—	—
3	Jammu & Kashmir	68	3	—	—
4	Maharashtra	55	2	—	—
5	Punjab	55	2	—	—
6	Gujarat	48	1	—	—
7	Himachal Pradesh	48	1	—	—
8	Tamil Nadu	48	1	—	—
9	Telangana	48	1	—	—

1
Pune65/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jalandhar65/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Jorhat54/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Kamrup54/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Sonitpur54/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Tinsukia54/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kachchh54/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Solan54/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Kupwara54/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Rajauri54/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Pune	65	2	—	—
2	Jalandhar	65	2	—	—
3	Jorhat	54	1	—	—
4	Kamrup	54	1	—	—
5	Sonitpur	54	1	—	—
6	Tinsukia	54	1	—	—
7	Kachchh	54	1	—	—
8	Solan	54	1	—	—
9	Kupwara	54	1	—	—
10	Rajauri	54	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

3 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Meat Mincer: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor