Limestone Powder (ONGC): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Limestone Powder (ONGC) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 2Awarded results: 1Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 2
Closed in period: 115
Awarded results: 1
Median winning price (L1): ₹1.4 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 5

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

4 Mar 2026

12 Apr 2026

4646 May 2026

5 Jun 2026

28 Jul 2026

6 Aug 2026

7 Sept 2026

8 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	4
Apr 2026	12
May 2026	46
Jun 2026	5
Jul 2026	28
Aug 2026	6
Sept 2026	7
Oct 2026	8
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 83%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 1%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Limestone Powder (ONGC)72/100
2 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Cyphenothrin29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Limestone Powder (ONGC)	72	2	115	5	₹1.4 lakh
2	Cyphenothrin	29	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Limestone Powder (ONGC)99/100
2 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.4 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Limestone Powder (ONGC)	99	2	115	5	₹1.4 lakh

1
Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh81/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
97
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Tamil Nadu63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Home Department Chhattisgarh54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Panchayati Raj52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Military Affairs34/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Central Armed Police Forces34/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Education Department Andaman & Nicobar34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Defence30/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Indian Railways30/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh	81	2	39	—	—
2	Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Tamil Nadu	63	0	47	—	—
3	Home Department Chhattisgarh	54	0	2	—	—
4	Department of Panchayati Raj	52	0	12	—	—
5	Department of Military Affairs	34	0	2	—	—
6	Central Armed Police Forces	34	0	2	—	—
7	Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar	34	0	2	—	—
8	Education Department Andaman & Nicobar	34	0	2	—	—
9	Department of Defence	30	0	1	—	—
10	Indian Railways	30	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Home Affairs49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Railways40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Steel40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	63	3	—	—
2	Ministry of Home Affairs	49	2	—	—
3	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	40	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Railways	40	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Steel	40	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh79/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
91
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Tamil Nadu63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Chhattisgarh53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Madhya Pradesh43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Andaman & Nicobar33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Karnataka33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Uttarakhand33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Goa30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Gujarat30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	79	2	40	—	—
2	Tamil Nadu	63	0	61	—	—
3	Chhattisgarh	53	0	2	—	—
4	Madhya Pradesh	43	0	3	—	—
5	Andaman & Nicobar	33	0	2	—	—
6	Karnataka	33	0	2	—	—
7	Uttarakhand	33	0	2	—	—
8	Goa	30	0	1	—	—
9	Gujarat	30	0	1	—	—

1
Salem63/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ghaziabad53/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Shahjahanpur53/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Dantewada50/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bagpat50/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Pratapgarh46/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Sant Kabir Nagar44/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Siddharthnagar43/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Unnao43/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
North and Middle Andaman33/100
Andaman & Nicobar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Salem	63	0	59	—	—
2	Ghaziabad	53	0	2	—	—
3	Shahjahanpur	53	1	1	—	—
4	Dantewada	50	0	1	—	—
5	Bagpat	50	1	0	—	—
6	Pratapgarh	46	0	5	—	—
7	Sant Kabir Nagar	44	0	4	—	—
8	Siddharthnagar	43	0	3	—	—
9	Unnao	43	0	3	—	—
10	North and Middle Andaman	33	0	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins

1 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers0%

of 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Limestone Powder (ONGC): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor