Light Weight Folding Rectangular Table: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Light Weight Folding Rectangular Table on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 13
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

0 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

55 Jul 2026

3 Aug 2026

1 Sept 2026

0 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	0
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	5
Aug 2026	3
Sept 2026	1
Oct 2026	0
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 92%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Light Weight Folding Rectangular Table73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Plastic Chairs For General Purposes conforming To Is 13713 (V3)58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Single / Double Wooden Bed with/without Storage (V2)43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Steel Folding Cot (V2)43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Modular Table / Meeting Table / Centre Table (V2)43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Light Weight Folding Rectangular Table	73	13	—	—
2	Plastic Chairs For General Purposes conforming To Is 13713 (V3)	58	3	—	—
3	Single / Double Wooden Bed with/without Storage (V2)	43	1	—	—
4	Steel Folding Cot (V2)	43	1	—	—
5	Modular Table / Meeting Table / Centre Table (V2)	43	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Light Weight Folding Rectangular Table100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Plastic Chairs For General Purposes conforming To Is 13713 (V3)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Light Weight Folding Rectangular Table	100	0	13	—	—
2	Plastic Chairs For General Purposes conforming To Is 13713 (V3)	100	0	3	—	—

1
Central Armed Police Forces73/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Military Affairs66/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Indian Railways47/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Central Police Organisation47/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Home Department Gujarat47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Water Resources Department Karnataka47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Social Justice and Empowerment47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Central Armed Police Forces	73	5	—	—
2	Department of Military Affairs	66	3	—	—
3	Indian Railways	47	1	—	—
4	Central Police Organisation	47	1	—	—
5	Home Department Gujarat	47	1	—	—
6	Water Resources Department Karnataka	47	1	—	—
7	Department of Social Justice and Empowerment	47	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Home Affairs73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Railways46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Home Affairs	73	6	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	64	3	—	—
3	Ministry of Railways	46	1	—	—

1
Assam73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Uttarakhand55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gujarat48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Himachal Pradesh48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Karnataka48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Maharashtra48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Punjab48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Rajasthan48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Uttar Pradesh48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Assam	73	4	—	—
2	Uttarakhand	55	2	—	—
3	Gujarat	48	1	—	—
4	Himachal Pradesh	48	1	—	—
5	Karnataka	48	1	—	—
6	Maharashtra	48	1	—	—
7	Punjab	48	1	—	—
8	Rajasthan	48	1	—	—
9	Uttar Pradesh	48	1	—	—

1
Kamrup73/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Pithoragarh55/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ahmedabad48/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Shimla48/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Gadag48/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Nagpur48/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Faridkot48/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Jaisalmer48/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bareilly48/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kamrup	73	4	—	—
2	Pithoragarh	55	2	—	—
3	Ahmedabad	48	1	—	—
4	Shimla	48	1	—	—
5	Gadag	48	1	—	—
6	Nagpur	48	1	—	—
7	Faridkot	48	1	—	—
8	Jaisalmer	48	1	—	—
9	Bareilly	48	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Light Weight Folding Rectangular Table: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor