Laser Range Finder: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Laser Range Finder on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 2Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 2
Closed in period: 21
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

66 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

1 Jul 2026

2 Aug 2026

5 Sept 2026

5 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	6
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	1
Aug 2026	2
Sept 2026	5
Oct 2026	5
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 45%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Laser Range Finder73/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
binocular60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Laser Range Finder	73	2	21	—	—
2	binocular	60	0	4	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Laser Range Finder100/100
2 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Laser Range Finder	100	2	21	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs69/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
33
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Defence Research & Development68/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
77
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Forest Department Rajasthan61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs55/100
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua) ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Higher Education Department, Assam55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited53/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Forests and Environment Department Gujarat53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Defence35/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Central Armed Police Forces35/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Home35/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	69	0	7	—	—
2	Department of Defence Research & Development	68	0	3	—	—
3	Forest Department Rajasthan	61	0	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs	55	1	0	—	—
5	Higher Education Department, Assam	55	1	0	—	—
6	Power Grid Corporation of India Limited	53	0	3	—	—
7	Forests and Environment Department Gujarat	53	0	3	—	—
8	Department of Defence	35	0	1	—	—
9	Central Armed Police Forces	35	0	1	—	—
10	Department of Home	35	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua)53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Power49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Home Affairs38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	71	0	11	—	—
2	Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua)	53	1	0	—	—
3	Ministry of Power	49	0	3	—	—
4	Ministry of Home Affairs	38	0	2	—	—

1
Rajasthan81/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Punjab64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
77
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Assam63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Delhi57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Gujarat56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jammu & Kashmir43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Maharashtra43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Himachal Pradesh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Tamil Nadu37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Telangana37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Rajasthan	81	0	5	—	—
2	Punjab	64	0	3	—	—
3	Assam	63	1	1	—	—
4	Delhi	57	1	0	—	—
5	Gujarat	56	0	3	—	—
6	Jammu & Kashmir	43	0	2	—	—
7	Maharashtra	43	0	2	—	—
8	Himachal Pradesh	37	0	1	—	—
9	Tamil Nadu	37	0	1	—	—
10	Telangana	37	0	1	—	—

1
Jodhpur75/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kokrajhar64/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
East Delhi64/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Amritsar64/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Jaipur64/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Lakhimpur44/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jamnagar44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Narmada44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Vadodara44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Solan44/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jodhpur	75	0	2	—	—
2	Kokrajhar	64	1	0	—	—
3	East Delhi	64	1	0	—	—
4	Amritsar	64	0	1	—	—
5	Jaipur	64	0	1	—	—
6	Lakhimpur	44	0	1	—	—
7	Jamnagar	44	0	1	—	—
8	Narmada	44	0	1	—	—
9	Vadodara	44	0	1	—	—
10	Solan	44	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Laser Range Finder: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor