High quality water purification system: GeM business opportunity

Who buys High quality water purification system on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 2Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 2
Closed in period: 38
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

4 Jun 2026

1010 Jul 2026

8 Aug 2026

9 Sept 2026

5 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	4
Jul 2026	10
Aug 2026	8
Sept 2026	9
Oct 2026	5
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 45%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 5%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
High quality water purification system72/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
UV - Visible Spectrophotometer (FSSAI)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	High quality water purification system	72	2	38	—	—
2	UV - Visible Spectrophotometer (FSSAI)	31	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
High quality water purification system97/100
2 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	High quality water purification system	97	2	38	—	—

1
Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat76/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Home Department Chhattisgarh69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
67
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Atomic Energy57/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Defence Research & Development56/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Military Affairs56/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Defence54/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)42/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (dsir)42/100
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Health Research42/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat	76	0	6	—	—
2	Home Department Chhattisgarh	69	1	2	—	—
3	Department of Atomic Energy	57	0	4	—	—
4	Department of Defence Research & Development	56	1	0	—	—
5	Department of Military Affairs	56	0	1	—	—
6	Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand	56	0	1	—	—
7	Department of Defence	54	0	3	—	—
8	Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)	42	0	2	—	—
9	Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (dsir)	42	0	2	—	—
10	Department of Health Research	42	0	2	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence83/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Pmo57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Science and Technology42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Commerce and Industry36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Home Affairs36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Power36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Textiles36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Ayush36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	83	1	5	—	—
2	Pmo	57	0	4	—	—
3	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	42	0	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	42	0	2	—	—
5	Ministry of Science and Technology	42	0	2	—	—
6	Ministry of Commerce and Industry	36	0	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Home Affairs	36	0	1	—	—
8	Ministry of Power	36	0	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Textiles	36	0	1	—	—
10	Ministry of Ayush	36	0	1	—	—

1
Gujarat76/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Chhattisgarh74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Jharkhand62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Uttar Pradesh57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Delhi56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jammu & Kashmir56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Karnataka54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Kerala54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Haryana42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Gujarat	76	0	6	—	—
2	Chhattisgarh	74	1	3	—	—
3	Maharashtra	63	0	6	—	—
4	Jharkhand	62	0	2	—	—
5	Uttar Pradesh	57	0	4	—	—
6	Delhi	56	1	0	—	—
7	Jammu & Kashmir	56	0	1	—	—
8	Karnataka	54	0	3	—	—
9	Kerala	54	0	3	—	—
10	Haryana	42	0	2	—	—

1
Raipur79/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Lucknow63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bangalore58/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Nagpur58/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
North Delhi58/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Porbandar58/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Srinagar58/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Dhanbad58/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Banaskantha45/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Panch Mahals45/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Raipur	79	1	3	—	—
2	Lucknow	63	0	4	—	—
3	Bangalore	58	0	3	—	—
4	Nagpur	58	0	3	—	—
5	North Delhi	58	1	0	—	—
6	Porbandar	58	0	1	—	—
7	Srinagar	58	0	1	—	—
8	Dhanbad	58	0	1	—	—
9	Banaskantha	45	0	2	—	—
10	Panch Mahals	45	0	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

High quality water purification system: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor