high performance power supplies: GeM business opportunity

Who buys high performance power supplies on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 14Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 14
Closed in period: 114
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: 6

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

6 Mar 2026

16 Apr 2026

2020 May 2026

14 Jun 2026

18 Jul 2026

8 Aug 2026

18 Sept 2026

19 Oct 2026

9 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	6
Apr 2026	16
May 2026	20
Jun 2026	14
Jul 2026	18
Aug 2026	8
Sept 2026	18
Oct 2026	19
Nov 2026	9

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 83%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 56%
Reverse auction: 3%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
high performance power supplies73/100
14 live · 6 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Circuit Breakers for DC Operation29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
14
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	high performance power supplies	73	14	114	6	—
2	Circuit Breakers for DC Operation	29	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
high performance power supplies100/100
14 live · 6 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	high performance power supplies	100	14	114	6	—

1
Department of Higher Education74/100
Ministry of Education ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Space73/100
Department of Space ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
51
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence Production68/100
Ministry of Defence ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
75
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Electronics and Information Technology68/100
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Atomic Energy59/100
Pmo ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
31
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (dsir)59/100
Ministry of Science and Technology ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Defence Research & Development55/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
75
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Training and Technical Education Department Delhi47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Military Affairs46/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live · 6 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Education Department Gujarat44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Higher Education	74	3	11	—	—
2	Department of Space	73	4	36	—	—
3	Department of Defence Production	68	2	13	—	—
4	Department of Electronics and Information Technology	68	2	4	—	—
5	Department of Atomic Energy	59	1	10	—	—
6	Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (dsir)	59	1	5	—	—
7	Department of Defence Research & Development	55	0	15	—	—
8	Training and Technical Education Department Delhi	47	0	5	—	—
9	Department of Military Affairs	46	0	4	6	—
10	Education Department Gujarat	44	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Education74/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Space73/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
51
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology68/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Defence67/100
2 live · 6 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
96
Momentum
30
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Pmo59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
31
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Science and Technology59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Railways31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Education	74	3	11	—	—
2	Department of Space	73	4	36	—	—
3	Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology	68	2	4	—	—
4	Ministry of Defence	67	2	32	6	—
5	Pmo	59	1	10	—	—
6	Ministry of Science and Technology	59	1	6	—	—
7	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	34	0	2	—	—
8	Ministry of Railways	31	0	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	31	0	1	—	—

1
Kerala75/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
61
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Karnataka70/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
72
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra66/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Delhi60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
37
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Telangana60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Chhattisgarh57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Gujarat51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Madhya Pradesh48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Rajasthan48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kerala	75	5	28	—	—
2	Karnataka	70	2	12	—	—
3	Maharashtra	66	2	8	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	65	1	13	—	—
5	Delhi	60	1	8	—	—
6	Telangana	60	0	7	—	—
7	Chhattisgarh	57	0	3	—	—
8	Gujarat	51	0	8	—	—
9	Madhya Pradesh	48	0	5	—	—
10	Rajasthan	48	0	5	—	—

1
Thiruvananthapuram72/100
Kerala ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Mumbai70/100
Maharashtra ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
96
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bangalore67/100
Karnataka ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Rangareddi65/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ghaziabad61/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Kozhikode59/100
Kerala ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Indore47/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Hyderabad47/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
North Delhi45/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ahmedabad45/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Thiruvananthapuram	72	3	25	—	—
2	Mumbai	70	2	5	—	—
3	Bangalore	67	1	11	—	—
4	Rangareddi	65	0	3	—	—
5	Ghaziabad	61	1	6	—	—
6	Kozhikode	59	2	2	—	—
7	Indore	47	0	4	—	—
8	Hyderabad	47	0	4	—	—
9	North Delhi	45	0	3	—	—
10	Ahmedabad	45	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

high performance power supplies: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor