High Mast Lighting Tower for large area with LED Flood Lighting System: GeM business opportunity
Who buys High Mast Lighting Tower for large area with LED Flood Lighting System on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 26
- Closed in period
- 814
- Awarded results
- 31
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹2.5 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 3.5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 22 |
| Apr 2026 | 152 |
| May 2026 | 140 |
| Jun 2026 | 129 |
| Jul 2026 | 120 |
| Aug 2026 | 102 |
| Sept 2026 | 69 |
| Oct 2026 | 93 |
| Nov 2026 | 13 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 60%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 15%
- Reverse auction
- 1%
based on 800 bids
based on 26 bids
based on 801 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
26 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 88
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Rigid GI Pipe (BHEL)28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High Mast Lighting Tower for large area with LED Flood Lighting System | 87 | 26 | 814 | 3.5 | ₹2.5 lakh |
| 2 | High Mast Lighting Octagonal Tower for Small area with LED Flood Lighting System (V2) | 30 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Rigid GI Pipe (BHEL) | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Galvanized Steel Chain Link Fence Fabric (V2) conforming to IS 2721 | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
26 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 88
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High Mast Lighting Tower for large area with LED Flood Lighting System | 91 | 26 | 814 | 3.5 | ₹2.5 lakh |
- 1
7 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.9 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 84
- 2
12 live · 3.2 bidders avg · L1 ₹20 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 79
- Low competition
- 91
- Easy criteria
- 94
- Order value
- 100
- 3
1 live · 2.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹4.9 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 23
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live · 4 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Defence ·0 live · 10 bidders avg · L1 ₹7.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 44
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 6
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panchayat Raj Department Bihar | 94 | 7 | 112 | 3 | ₹1.9 lakh |
| 2 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 92 | 12 | 166 | 3.2 | ₹20 lakh |
| 3 | Department of Panchayati Raj | 67 | 1 | 176 | 2.5 | ₹4.9 lakh |
| 4 | Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat | 66 | 1 | 27 | 4 | — |
| 5 | Department of Military Affairs | 65 | 0 | 57 | 10 | ₹7.4 lakh |
| 6 | Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand | 62 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Urban Development and Housing Department Jharkhand | 62 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Urban Development & Housing Department Bihar | 62 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Rural Development Department Bihar | 60 | 0 | 87 | 3 | ₹2.5 lakh |
| 10 | Urban Development and Environment Department | 60 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence71/100
0 live · 10 bidders avg · L1 ₹7.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Home Affairs63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Power63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Railways50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Ministry of Coal43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Pmo30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Ministry of Mines30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 71 | 0 | 59 | 10 | ₹7.4 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 63 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Power | 63 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Railways | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Coal | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Pmo | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Ministry of Mines | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh80/100
12 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.8 crore
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 91
- Momentum
- 53
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bihar68/100
9 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 30
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Tamil Nadu62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jharkhand61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 77
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Gujarat60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 59
- Momentum
- 47
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Rajasthan60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Uttarakhand57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 35
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Madhya Pradesh56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 22
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Maharashtra56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 22
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Jammu & Kashmir55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 56
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 80 | 12 | 207 | 3 | ₹1.8 crore |
| 2 | Bihar | 68 | 9 | 363 | — | — |
| 3 | Tamil Nadu | 62 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Jharkhand | 61 | 0 | 13 | — | — |
| 5 | Gujarat | 60 | 1 | 31 | — | — |
| 6 | Rajasthan | 60 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Uttarakhand | 57 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 8 | Madhya Pradesh | 56 | 0 | 46 | — | — |
| 9 | Maharashtra | 56 | 1 | 45 | — | — |
| 10 | Jammu & Kashmir | 55 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
- 1Begusarai67/100
Bihar ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 22
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jaunpur63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 35
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Kanpur Dehat62/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 88
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Khagaria62/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Vadodara62/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gopalganj61/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Jalpaiguri61/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Rajgarh60/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 35
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Godda60/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Chandrapur60/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Begusarai | 67 | 5 | 263 | — | — |
| 2 | Jaunpur | 63 | 3 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Kanpur Dehat | 62 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 4 | Khagaria | 62 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Vadodara | 62 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 6 | Gopalganj | 61 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Jalpaiguri | 61 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Rajgarh | 60 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 9 | Godda | 60 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Chandrapur | 60 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 11 wins
- 5 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
17 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 17 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.