Heavy Duty Storage Racks: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Heavy Duty Storage Racks on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 17
- Closed in period
- 176
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹2.7 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 4.8
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | 24 |
| May 2026 | 25 |
| Jun 2026 | 35 |
| Jul 2026 | 17 |
| Aug 2026 | 17 |
| Sept 2026 | 29 |
| Oct 2026 | 32 |
| Nov 2026 | 8 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 79%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 27%
- Reverse auction
- 3%
based on 186 bids
based on 15 bids
based on 181 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Heavy Duty Storage Racks80/100
17 live · 4.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.7 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 79
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Revolving Chair (V5)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Saline Stand (V2)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Executive Table (V4)29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Metal Storage Cabinet29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heavy Duty Storage Racks | 80 | 17 | 176 | 4.8 | ₹2.7 lakh |
| 2 | Modular Extendable Conference Table (V2) | 49 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Mobile Storage Compactors | 49 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Steel Almirah / Cabinets (V4) | 43 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Revolving Chair (V5) | 31 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Steel Filing Cabinets for General Office Purpose (V2) as per IS 3313 | 31 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Saline Stand (V2) | 31 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Composite Office Tables conforming To Is 8126 (V2) | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Executive Table (V4) | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Metal Storage Cabinet | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Heavy Duty Storage Racks85/100
17 live · 4.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.7 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 79
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steel Almirah / Cabinets (V4) | 100 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Heavy Duty Storage Racks | 85 | 17 | 176 | 4.8 | ₹2.7 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·2 live · 5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 41
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways69/100
Ministry of Railways ·4 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.7 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 81
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 63
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Gail India Limited61/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 26
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Railways ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Department of Atomic Energy ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 70 | 2 | 68 | 5 | — |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 69 | 4 | 31 | 5 | ₹2.7 lakh |
| 3 | Department of Defence | 63 | 2 | 5 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Defence Production | 61 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 5 | Gail India Limited | 61 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Atomic Energy | 58 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Health and Family Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir | 53 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Railways Public Sector Undertakings | 50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Consumer Affairs | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Atomic Energy | 50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence71/100
5 live · 5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 45
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Railways69/100
5 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.7 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 80
- Momentum
- 63
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Pmo57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ministry of Power46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Department of Space46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 71 | 5 | 84 | 5 | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Railways | 69 | 5 | 31 | 5 | ₹2.7 lakh |
| 3 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 61 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Pmo | 57 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Atomic Energy | 50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Power | 46 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 8 | Department of Space | 46 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua) | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Ministry of Urban Development | 32 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Punjab74/100
0 live · 5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Uttar Pradesh72/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 93
- Momentum
- 62
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Madhya Pradesh72/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Maharashtra70/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 39
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Kerala65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 44
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gujarat65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 47
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Andhra Pradesh65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Karnataka65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 63
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Jammu & Kashmir65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 75
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Bihar64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 41
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Punjab | 74 | 0 | 10 | 5 | — |
| 2 | Uttar Pradesh | 72 | 3 | 20 | — | — |
| 3 | Madhya Pradesh | 72 | 2 | 7 | — | — |
| 4 | Maharashtra | 70 | 2 | 27 | — | — |
| 5 | Kerala | 65 | 2 | 11 | — | — |
| 6 | Gujarat | 65 | 0 | 12 | — | — |
| 7 | Andhra Pradesh | 65 | 2 | 8 | — | — |
| 8 | Karnataka | 65 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 9 | Jammu & Kashmir | 65 | 2 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Bihar | 64 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Ernakulam75/100
Kerala ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gurdaspur74/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 72
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Pune73/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 52
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Mumbai68/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Meerut67/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Tinsukia66/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Jamnagar66/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kamrup58/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Thiruvananthapuram58/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Visakhapatnam52/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ernakulam | 75 | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Gurdaspur | 74 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Pune | 73 | 1 | 10 | — | — |
| 4 | Mumbai | 68 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Meerut | 67 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Tinsukia | 66 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Jamnagar | 66 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Kamrup | 58 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 9 | Thiruvananthapuram | 58 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 10 | Visakhapatnam | 52 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.