Hair Trimmer: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Hair Trimmer on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 2
- Closed in period
- 18
- Awarded results
- 2
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹1.5 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 3.5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 3 |
| Jul 2026 | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | 6 |
| Sept 2026 | 1 |
| Oct 2026 | 6 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 100%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 18 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 17 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Hair Trimmer73/100
2 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Hair Comb (V2)32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Computer Table (V3)32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hair Trimmer | 73 | 2 | 18 | 3.5 | ₹1.5 lakh |
| 2 | Hair Comb (V2) | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Computer Table (V3) | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Drilling Machine Bench Type / Pillar Type as per IS 2425 | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Hair Trimmer100/100
2 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.5 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hair Trimmer | 100 | 2 | 18 | 3.5 | ₹1.5 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·2 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 53
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 73 | 2 | 17 | 3.5 | ₹1.5 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Science and Technology (dst) | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence73/100
2 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 53
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 73 | 2 | 17 | 3.5 | ₹1.5 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Science and Technology | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Jammu & Kashmir70/100
0 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 36
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Uttar Pradesh68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 48
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Maharashtra60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Andhra Pradesh58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Arunachal Pradesh58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Sikkim58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Assam45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kerala38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Manipur38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Punjab38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jammu & Kashmir | 70 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ₹2.3 lakh |
| 2 | Uttar Pradesh | 68 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Maharashtra | 60 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Andhra Pradesh | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Arunachal Pradesh | 58 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Sikkim | 58 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 7 | Assam | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Kerala | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Manipur | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Punjab | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Pune69/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jhansi69/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Visakhapatnam64/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jammu64/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5East Sikkim64/100
Sikkim ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Kupwara55/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Cachar44/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Dhemaji44/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Poonch44/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Thiruvananthapuram44/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pune | 69 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Jhansi | 69 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Visakhapatnam | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Jammu | 64 | 0 | 1 | 4 | ₹2.3 lakh |
| 5 | East Sikkim | 64 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Kupwara | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Cachar | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Dhemaji | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Poonch | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Thiruvananthapuram | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
2 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 2 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.