GIS related Survey Services: GeM business opportunity

Who buys GIS related Survey Services on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 15Awarded results: 2Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 15
Closed in period: 114
Awarded results: 2
Median winning price (L1): ₹2.5 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 4

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

2 Feb 2026

4 Mar 2026

10 Apr 2026

12 May 2026

22 Jun 2026

13 Jul 2026

16 Aug 2026

22 Sept 2026

2424 Oct 2026

4 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	2
Mar 2026	4
Apr 2026	10
May 2026	12
Jun 2026	22
Jul 2026	13
Aug 2026	16
Sept 2026	22
Oct 2026	24
Nov 2026	4

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 46%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 33%
Reverse auction: 2%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
GIS related Survey Services72/100
15 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Total Station Survey Instrument (Coal India)29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
14
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	GIS related Survey Services	72	15	114	4	₹2.5 lakh
2	Total Station Survey Instrument (Coal India)	29	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
GIS related Survey Services98/100
15 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	GIS related Survey Services	98	15	114	4	₹2.5 lakh

1
Department of Defence74/100
Ministry of Defence ·2 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
57
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Forests and Environment Department Gujarat66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
45
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Energy Department Uttar Pradesh64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Forest Department Chhattisgarh58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
80
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Urban Development Department54/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
31
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
General Administration Department (gad) Chhattisgarh51/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat51/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Telecommunications (dot)49/100
Ministry of Communications ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Indian Oil Corporation Limited48/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation48/100
Ministry of Jal Shakti ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Defence	74	2	32	4	₹2.5 lakh
2	Forests and Environment Department Gujarat	66	1	3	—	—
3	Energy Department Uttar Pradesh	64	1	2	—	—
4	Forest Department Chhattisgarh	58	1	4	—	—
5	Urban Development Department	54	2	0	—	—
6	General Administration Department (gad) Chhattisgarh	51	1	0	—	—
7	Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat	51	1	0	—	—
8	Department of Telecommunications (dot)	49	0	6	—	—
9	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	48	0	5	—	—
10	Department of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation	48	0	5	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence73/100
2 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
51
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation71/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Mines59/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
22
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Communications48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Power47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Jal Shakti47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Home Affairs34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Culture34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Urban Development34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	73	2	36	4	₹2.5 lakh
2	Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation	71	4	5	—	—
3	Ministry of Mines	59	2	13	—	—
4	Ministry of Communications	48	0	6	—	—
5	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	48	0	6	—	—
6	Ministry of Power	47	0	5	—	—
7	Ministry of Jal Shakti	47	0	5	—	—
8	Ministry of Home Affairs	34	0	2	—	—
9	Ministry of Culture	34	0	2	—	—
10	Ministry of Urban Development	34	0	2	—	—

1
Assam77/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gujarat75/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
74
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Delhi70/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
81
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Maharashtra70/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
81
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Chhattisgarh67/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
90
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Uttar Pradesh66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
15
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Rajasthan62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
29
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Jammu & Kashmir62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
46
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Karnataka58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
45
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Uttarakhand53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Assam	77	3	8	—	—
2	Gujarat	75	2	7	—	—
3	Delhi	70	3	5	—	—
4	Maharashtra	70	2	6	—	—
5	Chhattisgarh	67	2	8	—	—
6	Uttar Pradesh	66	1	20	—	—
7	Rajasthan	62	1	10	—	—
8	Jammu & Kashmir	62	0	7	—	—
9	Karnataka	58	1	2	—	—
10	Uttarakhand	53	0	7	—	—

1
Central Delhi74/100
Delhi ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jorhat70/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
95
Momentum
46
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bikaner70/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gautam Buddha Nagar63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Jaipur59/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
89
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Lucknow57/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Dehradun57/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Patna54/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jammu54/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Mumbai54/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Central Delhi	74	3	1	—	—
2	Jorhat	70	1	6	—	—
3	Bikaner	70	1	4	—	—
4	Gautam Buddha Nagar	63	0	8	—	—
5	Jaipur	59	0	6	—	—
6	Lucknow	57	0	5	—	—
7	Dehradun	57	0	5	—	—
8	Patna	54	0	4	—	—
9	Jammu	54	0	4	—	—
10	Mumbai	54	0	4	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins
1 wins

2 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

GIS related Survey Services: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor