Fire Buckets Stand (MRPL): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Fire Buckets Stand (MRPL) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 0
- Closed in period
- 9
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 1 |
| Sept 2026 | 1 |
| Oct 2026 | 2 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 100%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- —
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 9 bids
based on 0 bids
based on 9 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 75
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fire Buckets Stand (MRPL) | 73 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | Fire Hooks (Fire suppression hand tools) | 66 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | GALVANIZED MILD STEEL FIRE BUCKET (V2) Conforming to IS 2546 | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Fire Beaters (Fire suppression hand tools) | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Fire Buckets Stand (MRPL)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 75
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fire Buckets Stand (MRPL) | 100 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | Fire Hooks (Fire suppression hand tools) | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | GALVANIZED MILD STEEL FIRE BUCKET (V2) Conforming to IS 2546 | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Department of Defence44/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Coal India Limited44/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 75 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Food and Public Distribution | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Defence | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Central Armed Police Forces | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Bhakra Beas Managemet Board | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Coal India Limited | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence78/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 75
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Home Affairs40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Power40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Coal40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 78 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Power | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Coal | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh75/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kerala64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Punjab55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Arunachal Pradesh44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Jharkhand44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Odisha44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Tamil Nadu44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 75 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Kerala | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Punjab | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Arunachal Pradesh | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Jharkhand | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Odisha | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Tamil Nadu | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Alappuzha75/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bareilly75/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3West Kameng55/100
Arunachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4East Singhbhum55/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Angul55/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Fazilka55/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ludhiana55/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Coimbatore55/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Jalaun55/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alappuzha | 75 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Bareilly | 75 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | West Kameng | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | East Singhbhum | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Angul | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Fazilka | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Ludhiana | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Coimbatore | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Jalaun | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.