Field test kit: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Field test kit on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 3
- Closed in period
- 5
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹8.4 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 6
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 1 |
| Sept 2026 | 1 |
| Oct 2026 | 2 |
| Nov 2026 | 2 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 40%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 5 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 5 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Field test kit70/100
3 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹8.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 80
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Digital pH Meter34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Field test kit | 70 | 3 | 5 | 6 | ₹8.4 lakh |
| 2 | Digital pH Meter | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Field test kit80/100
3 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹8.4 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 80
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Field test kit | 80 | 3 | 5 | 6 | ₹8.4 lakh |
- 1
1 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹8.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 89
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Health Engineering Department Chhattisgarh | 73 | 1 | 2 | 6 | ₹8.4 lakh |
| 2 | Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Karnataka | 60 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare) | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Panchayati Raj Department Odisha | 40 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Local Government Department Punjab | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Chhattisgarh68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 67
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Karnataka64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Maharashtra44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Odisha44/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Punjab44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Uttarakhand44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chhattisgarh | 68 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Karnataka | 64 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Maharashtra | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Odisha | 44 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Punjab | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Uttarakhand | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Janjgir-champa68/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 67
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ramanagar64/100
Karnataka ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Mumbai44/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jalandhar44/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Nainital44/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Janjgir-champa | 68 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Ramanagar | 64 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Mumbai | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Jalandhar | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Nainital | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.