Electrocautery Machine (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Electrocautery Machine (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 4
- Closed in period
- 58
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹5.3 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 5 |
| May 2026 | 6 |
| Jun 2026 | 9 |
| Jul 2026 | 16 |
| Aug 2026 | 7 |
| Sept 2026 | 10 |
| Oct 2026 | 6 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 45%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 50%
- Reverse auction
- 2%
based on 60 bids
based on 2 bids
based on 59 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
4 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Vertical Autoclave30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Syringe Infusion Pump30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Horizontal Autoclave30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Anaesthesia Machine (V2)30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Electrocautery Machine (V2) | 73 | 4 | 58 | 5 | ₹5.3 lakh |
| 2 | Vertical Autoclave | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | OT Table positioning Pads | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Syringe Infusion Pump | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Horizontal Autoclave | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Anaesthesia Machine (V2) | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Electrocautery Machine (V2)100/100
4 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.3 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Electrocautery Machine (V2) | 100 | 4 | 58 | 5 | ₹5.3 lakh |
- 1
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 87
- Momentum
- 74
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 67
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Department of Defence60/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Indian Railways50/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat | 83 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh | 73 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 3 | Health and Family Welfare Department Assam | 73 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Defence | 60 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 5 | Employees State Insuarnce Corporation | 54 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Military Affairs | 50 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi | 50 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Indian Railways | 50 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat | 50 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Atomic Energy | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Railways49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Pmo38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Power33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ministry of Mines33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 63 | 0 | 11 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Labour and Employment | 53 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Railways | 49 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Pmo | 38 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Power | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Science and Technology | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Mines | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Gujarat83/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Assam72/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Uttar Pradesh69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Tamil Nadu60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Delhi52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Maharashtra50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Kerala48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Bihar37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Chhattisgarh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Jharkhand37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gujarat | 83 | 1 | 14 | — | — |
| 2 | Assam | 72 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Uttar Pradesh | 69 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 4 | Tamil Nadu | 60 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Delhi | 52 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 50 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Kerala | 48 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Bihar | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Chhattisgarh | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Jharkhand | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Lucknow83/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ahmedabad63/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Vadodara63/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Barpeta57/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Junagadh57/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Tirunelveli57/100
Tamil Nadu ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Dibrugarh56/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Mumbai56/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Patna43/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Central Delhi43/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lucknow | 83 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Ahmedabad | 63 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Vadodara | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Barpeta | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Junagadh | 57 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Tirunelveli | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 7 | Dibrugarh | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Mumbai | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Patna | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Central Delhi | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.