Electric Two Wheeler - Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Electric Two Wheeler - Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 6Awarded results: 1Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 6
Closed in period: 133
Awarded results: 1
Median winning price (L1): ₹36 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 2

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

5 Mar 2026

13 Apr 2026

9 May 2026

15 Jun 2026

20 Jul 2026

21 Aug 2026

2929 Sept 2026

23 Oct 2026

3 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	5
Apr 2026	13
May 2026	9
Jun 2026	15
Jul 2026	20
Aug 2026	21
Sept 2026	29
Oct 2026	23
Nov 2026	3

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 96%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 17%
Reverse auction: 2%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Electric Two Wheeler - Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped73/100
6 live · 2 bidders avg · L1 ₹36 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
E-cart for Goods29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
14
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Electric Two Wheeler - Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped	73	6	133	2	₹36 lakh
2	E-cart for Goods	29	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Electric Two Wheeler - Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped100/100
6 live · 2 bidders avg · L1 ₹36 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Electric Two Wheeler - Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped	100	6	133	2	₹36 lakh

1
Local Self Government Department Kerala75/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
87
Momentum
81
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Indian Railways70/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat70/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Defence Production67/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Military Affairs65/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
13
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Defence61/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
52
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Higher Education57/100
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Forest and Wild Life Department Kerala51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Home Department Bihar47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Defence Research & Development45/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Local Self Government Department Kerala	75	4	14	—	—
2	Indian Railways	70	0	6	—	—
3	Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat	70	1	5	—	—
4	Department of Defence Production	67	1	12	—	—
5	Department of Military Affairs	65	0	29	—	—
6	Department of Defence	61	0	7	—	—
7	Department of Higher Education	57	0	3	—	—
8	Forest and Wild Life Department Kerala	51	0	7	—	—
9	Home Department Bihar	47	0	4	—	—
10	Department of Defence Research & Development	45	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
28
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Railways68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Education55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
35
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Home Affairs33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Communications33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Pmo33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Commerce and Industry30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Steel30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	68	1	51	—	—
2	Ministry of Railways	68	0	7	—	—
3	Ministry of Education	55	0	3	—	—
4	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	53	0	2	—	—
5	Ministry of Home Affairs	33	0	2	—	—
6	Ministry of Communications	33	0	2	—	—
7	Pmo	33	0	2	—	—
8	Ministry of Commerce and Industry	30	0	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	30	0	1	—	—
10	Ministry of Steel	30	0	1	—	—

1
Kerala75/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
63
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gujarat71/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Delhi64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
45
Momentum
91
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Chandigarh64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Maharashtra64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Karnataka62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
17
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jharkhand62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
73
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Tamil Nadu60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
41
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Telangana60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
41
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Uttar Pradesh52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kerala	75	4	31	—	—
2	Gujarat	71	1	7	—	—
3	Delhi	64	0	4	—	—
4	Chandigarh	64	0	3	—	—
5	Maharashtra	64	1	2	—	—
6	Karnataka	62	0	21	—	—
7	Jharkhand	62	0	5	—	—
8	Tamil Nadu	60	0	9	—	—
9	Telangana	60	0	9	—	—
10	Uttar Pradesh	52	0	9	—	—

1
Thiruvananthapuram76/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
96
Momentum
73
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Dhanbad70/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
91
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Kollam70/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
91
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Kozhikode70/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
91
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Chandigarh69/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bharuch69/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ernakulam69/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Malappuram69/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bangalore63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Hyderabad59/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
88
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Thiruvananthapuram	76	0	10	—	—
2	Dhanbad	70	0	4	—	—
3	Kollam	70	1	3	—	—
4	Kozhikode	70	1	3	—	—
5	Chandigarh	69	0	3	—	—
6	Bharuch	69	0	3	—	—
7	Ernakulam	69	1	2	—	—
8	Malappuram	69	1	2	—	—
9	Bangalore	63	0	11	—	—
10	Hyderabad	59	0	8	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins

1 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers0%

of 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Electric Two Wheeler - Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor