EEG Machine: GeM business opportunity

Who buys EEG Machine on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 5Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 5
Closed in period: 16
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

1 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

3 May 2026

0 Jun 2026

2 Jul 2026

3 Aug 2026

44 Sept 2026

4 Oct 2026

2 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	1
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	3
Jun 2026	0
Jul 2026	2
Aug 2026	3
Sept 2026	4
Oct 2026	4
Nov 2026	2

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 24%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 100%
Reverse auction: 18%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
EEG Machine72/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
94
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Electrocardiography (ECG) Machine (V2)36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	EEG Machine	72	5	16	—	—
2	Electrocardiography (ECG) Machine (V2)	36	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
EEG Machine94/100
5 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
94
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	EEG Machine	94	5	16	—	—

1
Department of Health and Family Welfare73/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
88
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh69/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Education Department Chandigarh60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department Jharkhand49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Science and Technology (dst)40/100
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Health Research40/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Revenue Department Madhya Pradesh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Medical Education Department Uttarakhand40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Health and Family Welfare	73	2	1	—	—
2	Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh	69	2	0	—	—
3	Department of Defence	63	0	3	—	—
4	Education Department Chandigarh	60	1	0	—	—
5	Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat	49	0	2	—	—
6	Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department Jharkhand	49	0	2	—	—
7	Department of Science and Technology (dst)	40	0	1	—	—
8	Department of Health Research	40	0	1	—	—
9	Revenue Department Madhya Pradesh	40	0	1	—	—
10	Medical Education Department Uttarakhand	40	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare68/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
66
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Ayush45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Labour and Employment38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Science and Technology38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	68	2	2	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	58	0	3	—	—
3	Ministry of Ayush	45	0	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Labour and Employment	38	0	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Science and Technology	38	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh75/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Chandigarh69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Puducherry60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Delhi49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Gujarat49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jharkhand49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kerala49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Madhya Pradesh49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Rajasthan49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Assam40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	75	2	1	—	—
2	Chandigarh	69	1	1	—	—
3	Puducherry	60	1	0	—	—
4	Delhi	49	0	2	—	—
5	Gujarat	49	0	2	—	—
6	Jharkhand	49	0	2	—	—
7	Kerala	49	0	2	—	—
8	Madhya Pradesh	49	0	2	—	—
9	Rajasthan	49	1	1	—	—
10	Assam	40	0	1	—	—

1
Chandigarh75/100
Chandigarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Karaikal64/100
Puducherry ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Kannauj64/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Lucknow64/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
South Delhi55/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jodhpur55/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kamrup44/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Dahod44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Surendra Nagar44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Dhanbad44/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Chandigarh	75	1	1	—	—
2	Karaikal	64	1	0	—	—
3	Kannauj	64	1	0	—	—
4	Lucknow	64	1	0	—	—
5	South Delhi	55	0	2	—	—
6	Jodhpur	55	1	1	—	—
7	Kamrup	44	0	1	—	—
8	Dahod	44	0	1	—	—
9	Surendra Nagar	44	0	1	—	—
10	Dhanbad	44	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

EEG Machine: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor