Development Tools for Web Application / Portal Application Software: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Development Tools for Web Application / Portal Application Software on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 37
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

4 Mar 2026

3 Apr 2026

5 May 2026

3 Jun 2026

4 Jul 2026

6 Aug 2026

88 Sept 2026

3 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	4
Apr 2026	3
May 2026	5
Jun 2026	3
Jul 2026	4
Aug 2026	6
Sept 2026	8
Oct 2026	3
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 41%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Development Tools for Web Application / Portal Application Software73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Custom Bid for Services47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Inspection Door Assembly (BHEL)34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Hiring of Consultancy Services - Percentage based34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Horticulture Service - Lumpsum based34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Maintenance of landline and broadband networks - Cluster Outsourcing model34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Designing Software (V3)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Artificial intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning as a Service31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Design Installation and Maintenance of Educational Lab/Centre31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Development Tools for Web Application / Portal Application Software	73	37	—	—
2	Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based	51	1	—	—
3	Custom Bid for Services	47	5	—	—
4	Inspection Door Assembly (BHEL)	34	2	—	—
5	Hiring of Consultancy Services - Percentage based	34	2	—	—
6	Horticulture Service - Lumpsum based	34	2	—	—
7	Maintenance of landline and broadband networks - Cluster Outsourcing model	34	2	—	—
8	Designing Software (V3)	31	1	—	—
9	Artificial intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning as a Service	31	1	—	—
10	Design Installation and Maintenance of Educational Lab/Centre	31	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Development Tools for Web Application / Portal Application Software100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Custom Bid for Services100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Development Tools for Web Application / Portal Application Software	100	0	37	—	—
2	Custom Bid for Services	100	0	5	—	—

1
Department of Defence Research & Development63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Forest Department Himachal Pradesh54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)53/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Defence Production53/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Atomic Energy53/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Higher Education51/100
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Military Affairs39/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Health and Family Welfare34/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Electronics and Information Technology34/100
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Heavy Industry34/100
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Defence Research & Development	63	9	—	—
2	Forest Department Himachal Pradesh	54	1	—	—
3	Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)	53	4	—	—
4	Department of Defence Production	53	4	—	—
5	Department of Atomic Energy	53	4	—	—
6	Department of Higher Education	51	3	—	—
7	Department of Military Affairs	39	2	—	—
8	Department of Health and Family Welfare	34	1	—	—
9	Department of Electronics and Information Technology	34	1	—	—
10	Department of Heavy Industry	34	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Pmo50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Education48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Finance33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Civil Aviation33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	63	15	—	—
2	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	50	4	—	—
3	Pmo	50	4	—	—
4	Ministry of Education	48	3	—	—
5	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	33	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Finance	33	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology	33	1	—	—
8	Ministry of Civil Aviation	33	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	33	1	—	—
10	Ministry of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation	33	1	—	—

1
Himachal Pradesh73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Karnataka63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Tamil Nadu61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Delhi56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Haryana56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Maharashtra56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Uttar Pradesh53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Gujarat35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jharkhand35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Kerala35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Himachal Pradesh	73	3	—	—
2	Karnataka	63	7	—	—
3	Tamil Nadu	61	6	—	—
4	Delhi	56	4	—	—
5	Haryana	56	4	—	—
6	Maharashtra	56	4	—	—
7	Uttar Pradesh	53	3	—	—
8	Gujarat	35	1	—	—
9	Jharkhand	35	1	—	—
10	Kerala	35	1	—	—

1
Bangalore63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kanchipuram56/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Kangra55/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Karnal53/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
South West Delhi41/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Mandi41/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Mumbai41/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Pune41/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Tiruchirappalli41/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Central Delhi35/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bangalore	63	7	—	—
2	Kanchipuram	56	4	—	—
3	Kangra	55	1	—	—
4	Karnal	53	3	—	—
5	South West Delhi	41	2	—	—
6	Mandi	41	2	—	—
7	Mumbai	41	2	—	—
8	Pune	41	2	—	—
9	Tiruchirappalli	41	2	—	—
10	Central Delhi	35	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Development Tools for Web Application / Portal Application Software: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor