Dental Autoclave: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Dental Autoclave on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 27
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- 10
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 |
| May 2026 | 7 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | 3 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 2 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 67%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 100%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 27 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 26 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Dental Autoclave73/100
1 live · 10 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2DENTAL ENDOMOTOR51/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Dental Chair51/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dental Autoclave | 73 | 1 | 27 | 10 | — |
| 2 | DENTAL ENDOMOTOR | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Dental RadioVisioGraphy (RVG) Unit (V2) | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 4 | Dental X - Ray Machine (V2) | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Dental Chair | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Dental Autoclave100/100
1 live · 10 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dental Autoclave | 100 | 1 | 27 | 10 | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live · 10 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Coal India Limited57/100
Ministry of Coal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Department of Defence43/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Indian Railways37/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Health and Family Welfare Department Assam | 59 | 0 | 4 | 10 | — |
| 3 | Education Department Chandigarh | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Coal India Limited | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Defence | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Employees State Insuarnce Corporation | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Department of Atomic Energy | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Department of Health and Family Welfare | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Urban Development Department Delhi | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Indian Railways | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Coal55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Pmo41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Railways35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Labour and Employment | 76 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Defence | 63 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Coal | 55 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 4 | Pmo | 41 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Railways | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Delhi80/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Chandigarh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Madhya Pradesh62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Assam57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Tamil Nadu54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Maharashtra42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Rajasthan42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Jammu & Kashmir36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Karnataka36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Kerala36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delhi | 80 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Chandigarh | 63 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 3 | Madhya Pradesh | 62 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Assam | 57 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Tamil Nadu | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Rajasthan | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Jammu & Kashmir | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Karnataka | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Kerala | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Chandigarh63/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Sidhi62/100
Madhya Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Dibrugarh42/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4New Delhi42/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Tirunelveli42/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Cachar36/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Kamrup36/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8East Delhi36/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9South Delhi36/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Udhampur36/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chandigarh | 63 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 2 | Sidhi | 62 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Dibrugarh | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | New Delhi | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Tirunelveli | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Cachar | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Kamrup | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | East Delhi | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | South Delhi | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Udhampur | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.