Decorative Lightning Pole (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Decorative Lightning Pole (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 26
- Closed in period
- 384
- Awarded results
- 3
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹56 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 2 |
| Mar 2026 | 10 |
| Apr 2026 | 73 |
| May 2026 | 29 |
| Jun 2026 | 62 |
| Jul 2026 | 43 |
| Aug 2026 | 39 |
| Sept 2026 | 61 |
| Oct 2026 | 80 |
| Nov 2026 | 11 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 18%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 1%
based on 384 bids
based on 6 bids
based on 370 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
26 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹56 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value
- 100
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 35
- Momentum
- 44
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 31
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Decorative Lightning Pole (V2) | 88 | 26 | 384 | 3 | ₹56 lakh |
| 2 | XLPE Cable for Working Voltage up to and Including 1.1 KV Marked To IS 7098 (Part 1) | 52 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 3 | LED Luminaire For Road And Street Lights Conforming To IS 10322 (Part 5/Section 3) (V3) (Under BIS Scheme - II) | 51 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 35
- Momentum
- 44
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 31
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
26 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹56 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XLPE Cable for Working Voltage up to and Including 1.1 KV Marked To IS 7098 (Part 1) | 100 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 2 | LED Luminaire For Road And Street Lights Conforming To IS 10322 (Part 5/Section 3) (V3) (Under BIS Scheme - II) | 100 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 3 | Decorative Lightning Pole (V2) | 94 | 26 | 384 | 3 | ₹56 lakh |
- 1
22 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹56 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 56
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value
- 100
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 55
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 59
- Momentum
- 23
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 12
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 12
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 89 | 22 | 270 | 3 | ₹56 lakh |
| 2 | Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat | 63 | 0 | 22 | — | — |
| 3 | Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar | 55 | 0 | 27 | — | — |
| 4 | Urban Development & Housing Department Bihar | 55 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat | 51 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Urban Development and Environment Department | 51 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Rural Development Department Gujarat | 49 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Housing and Urban Planning Department Uttar Pradesh | 49 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Panchayat Raj Department Bihar | 47 | 0 | 15 | — | — |
| 10 | Housing and Urban Development Department Odisha | 46 | 0 | 13 | — | — |
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 55 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh73/100
22 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹71 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 53
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat67/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Madhya Pradesh57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 32
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Bihar52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 62
- Momentum
- 10
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Odisha46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Maharashtra41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Jharkhand40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Uttarakhand40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 73 | 22 | 269 | 3 | ₹71 lakh |
| 2 | Gujarat | 67 | 2 | 28 | — | — |
| 3 | Madhya Pradesh | 57 | 1 | 28 | — | — |
| 4 | Bihar | 52 | 1 | 31 | — | — |
| 5 | Odisha | 46 | 0 | 13 | — | — |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 41 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Jharkhand | 40 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Uttarakhand | 40 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Bulandshahr82/100
Uttar Pradesh ·6 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 98
- Momentum
- 99
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kushinagar81/100
Uttar Pradesh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 99
- Momentum
- 96
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bharuch73/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 88
- Momentum
- 69
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Bijnor71/100
Uttar Pradesh ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 78
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Basti70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Auraiya69/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 62
- Momentum
- 89
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Balrampur67/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Mainpuri67/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹71 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Sitapur66/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 33
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Pilibhit66/100
Uttar Pradesh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 85
- Momentum
- 39
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bulandshahr | 82 | 6 | 19 | — | — |
| 2 | Kushinagar | 81 | 2 | 24 | — | — |
| 3 | Bharuch | 73 | 0 | 18 | — | — |
| 4 | Bijnor | 71 | 3 | 9 | — | — |
| 5 | Basti | 70 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 6 | Auraiya | 69 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 7 | Balrampur | 67 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Mainpuri | 67 | 0 | 4 | 3 | ₹71 lakh |
| 9 | Sitapur | 66 | 0 | 19 | — | — |
| 10 | Pilibhit | 66 | 2 | 14 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
3 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.