Dark Fiber Lease Service - Point to Point Based: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Dark Fiber Lease Service - Point to Point Based on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 20
- Closed in period
- 217
- Awarded results
- 4
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹6.6 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 1.8
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 8 |
| Apr 2026 | 25 |
| May 2026 | 22 |
| Jun 2026 | 36 |
| Jul 2026 | 28 |
| Aug 2026 | 39 |
| Sept 2026 | 43 |
| Oct 2026 | 30 |
| Nov 2026 | 6 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 98%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 225 bids
based on 19 bids
based on 225 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
20 live · 1.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹6.6 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 100
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dark Fiber Lease Service - Point to Point Based | 90 | 20 | 217 | 1.8 | ₹6.6 lakh |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
20 live · 1.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹6.6 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 100
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dark Fiber Lease Service - Point to Point Based | 100 | 20 | 217 | 1.8 | ₹6.6 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Power ·20 live · 1.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹6.6 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 51
- Low competition
- 100
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
- 2
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Communications ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power Grid Corporation of India Limited | 90 | 20 | 212 | 1.8 | ₹6.6 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Electronics and Information Technology | 31 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Telecommunications (dot) | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Railways Public Sector Undertakings | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Grid Controller of India Limited | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Power90/100
20 live · 1.8 bidders avg · L1 ₹6.6 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 51
- Low competition
- 100
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Railways29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 13
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Power | 90 | 20 | 213 | 1.8 | ₹6.6 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology | 31 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Communications | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Railways | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Assam76/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 85
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Delhi75/100
1 live · 3 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 96
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Uttar Pradesh75/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 74
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Goa72/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 66
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Jammu & Kashmir70/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 96
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Karnataka69/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Kerala65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 82
- Momentum
- 40
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Madhya Pradesh65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 48
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Uttarakhand65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 96
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assam | 76 | 5 | 16 | — | — |
| 2 | Delhi | 75 | 1 | 15 | 3 | — |
| 3 | Uttar Pradesh | 75 | 4 | 10 | — | — |
| 4 | Goa | 72 | 3 | 7 | — | — |
| 5 | Jammu & Kashmir | 70 | 0 | 8 | 1 | — |
| 6 | Karnataka | 69 | 2 | 18 | — | — |
| 7 | Kerala | 65 | 2 | 17 | — | — |
| 8 | Madhya Pradesh | 65 | 2 | 14 | — | — |
| 9 | Uttarakhand | 65 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Maharashtra | 63 | 0 | 37 | — | — |
- 1Kamrup81/100
Assam ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2South Delhi79/100
Delhi ·1 live · 3 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3North Goa76/100
Goa ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Lucknow75/100
Uttar Pradesh ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 74
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Bangalore74/100
Karnataka ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 98
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Indore73/100
Madhya Pradesh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 67
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ernakulam70/100
Kerala ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 48
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Dehradun67/100
Uttarakhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 52
- Momentum
- 96
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Vadodara65/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 76
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Krishna64/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 64
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kamrup | 81 | 5 | 16 | — | — |
| 2 | South Delhi | 79 | 1 | 14 | 3 | — |
| 3 | North Goa | 76 | 3 | 7 | — | — |
| 4 | Lucknow | 75 | 3 | 6 | — | — |
| 5 | Bangalore | 74 | 2 | 18 | — | — |
| 6 | Indore | 73 | 2 | 5 | — | — |
| 7 | Ernakulam | 70 | 2 | 14 | — | — |
| 8 | Dehradun | 67 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Vadodara | 65 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 10 | Krishna | 64 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 2 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
3 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.