Cultivator: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Cultivator on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 16
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

3 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

2 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

1 Jul 2026

44 Aug 2026

3 Sept 2026

0 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	3
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	2
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	1
Aug 2026	4
Sept 2026	3
Oct 2026	0
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 69%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Cultivator73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Agriculture rotavator57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Multi Crop Thresher42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Shrub Master42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Chaff Cutter42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Self Propelled Reaper42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
MB Plough / Reversible MB Plough42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Power sprayer42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Mini Rice Mill42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Hand Held Brush Cutter (V2)42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Cultivator	73	16	—	—
2	Agriculture rotavator	57	3	—	—
3	Multi Crop Thresher	42	1	—	—
4	Shrub Master	42	1	—	—
5	Chaff Cutter	42	1	—	—
6	Self Propelled Reaper	42	1	—	—
7	MB Plough / Reversible MB Plough	42	1	—	—
8	Power sprayer	42	1	—	—
9	Mini Rice Mill	42	1	—	—
10	Hand Held Brush Cutter (V2)	42	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Cultivator100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Agriculture rotavator100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Cultivator	100	0	16	—	—
2	Agriculture rotavator	100	0	3	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs73/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Panchayat and Rural Development Department Madhya Pradesh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Central Armed Police Forces50/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Defence Production50/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare50/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Numaligarh Refinery Limited50/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Industries and Mines Department Gujarat50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Agriculture Production Department Jammu and Kashmir50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Forest and Environment Department Jharkhand50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	73	3	—	—
2	Panchayat and Rural Development Department Madhya Pradesh	59	2	—	—
3	Central Armed Police Forces	50	1	—	—
4	Department of Defence Production	50	1	—	—
5	Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	50	1	—	—
6	Numaligarh Refinery Limited	50	1	—	—
7	Industries and Mines Department Gujarat	50	1	—	—
8	Agriculture Production Department Jammu and Kashmir	50	1	—	—
9	Forest and Environment Department Jharkhand	50	1	—	—
10	Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh	50	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Home Affairs48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	73	4	—	—
2	Ministry of Home Affairs	48	1	—	—
3	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	48	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change	48	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	48	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Madhya Pradesh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Punjab59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Assam50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bihar50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Chhattisgarh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Gujarat50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Haryana50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jammu & Kashmir50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jharkhand50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	73	3	—	—
2	Madhya Pradesh	59	2	—	—
3	Punjab	59	2	—	—
4	Assam	50	1	—	—
5	Bihar	50	1	—	—
6	Chhattisgarh	50	1	—	—
7	Gujarat	50	1	—	—
8	Haryana	50	1	—	—
9	Jammu & Kashmir	50	1	—	—
10	Jharkhand	50	1	—	—

1
Anuppur65/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Golaghat54/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gaya54/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Dantewada54/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Kachchh54/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Hisar54/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jammu54/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Dumka54/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Amritsar54/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jalandhar54/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Anuppur	65	2	—	—
2	Golaghat	54	1	—	—
3	Gaya	54	1	—	—
4	Dantewada	54	1	—	—
5	Kachchh	54	1	—	—
6	Hisar	54	1	—	—
7	Jammu	54	1	—	—
8	Dumka	54	1	—	—
9	Amritsar	54	1	—	—
10	Jalandhar	54	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Cultivator: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor