Cordless screw driver: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Cordless screw driver on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 1Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 1
Closed in period: 15
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

88 Jun 2026

3 Jul 2026

1 Aug 2026

2 Sept 2026

1 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	8
Jul 2026	3
Aug 2026	1
Sept 2026	2
Oct 2026	1
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 88%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Cordless screw driver73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Impact Wrench57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Cordless screw driver	73	1	15	—	—
2	Impact Wrench	57	1	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Cordless screw driver100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Cordless screw driver	100	1	15	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs83/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Indian Railways53/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence Production53/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Central Armed Police Forces35/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bhakra Beas Managemet Board35/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Technical Education Department Himachal Pradesh35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	83	1	6	—	—
2	Indian Railways	53	0	3	—	—
3	Department of Defence Production	53	0	3	—	—
4	Central Armed Police Forces	35	0	1	—	—
5	Bhakra Beas Managemet Board	35	0	1	—	—
6	Technical Education Department Himachal Pradesh	35	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence79/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
80
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Railways50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Home Affairs34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Power34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	79	1	9	—	—
2	Ministry of Railways	50	0	3	—	—
3	Ministry of Home Affairs	34	0	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Power	34	0	1	—	—

1
Jammu & Kashmir83/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Chhattisgarh49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Karnataka49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Haryana40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Himachal Pradesh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Madhya Pradesh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Maharashtra40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Punjab40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Tripura40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jammu & Kashmir	83	1	2	—	—
2	Chhattisgarh	49	0	2	—	—
3	Karnataka	49	0	2	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	49	0	2	—	—
5	Haryana	40	0	1	—	—
6	Himachal Pradesh	40	0	1	—	—
7	Madhya Pradesh	40	0	1	—	—
8	Maharashtra	40	0	1	—	—
9	Punjab	40	0	1	—	—
10	Tripura	40	0	1	—	—

1
Jammu75/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Bilaspur55/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bangalore55/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Faridabad44/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Kinnaur44/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Baramulla44/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Gwalior44/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Mumbai44/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ludhiana44/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
West Tripura44/100
Tripura ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jammu	75	1	1	—	—
2	Bilaspur	55	0	2	—	—
3	Bangalore	55	0	2	—	—
4	Faridabad	44	0	1	—	—
5	Kinnaur	44	0	1	—	—
6	Baramulla	44	0	1	—	—
7	Gwalior	44	0	1	—	—
8	Mumbai	44	0	1	—	—
9	Ludhiana	44	0	1	—	—
10	West Tripura	44	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Cordless screw driver: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor