Controls for Diagnostic Analyzers: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Controls for Diagnostic Analyzers on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 2Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 2
Closed in period: 7
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

22 Apr 2026

0 May 2026

0 Jun 2026

1 Jul 2026

0 Aug 2026

2 Sept 2026

2 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	2
May 2026	0
Jun 2026	0
Jul 2026	1
Aug 2026	0
Sept 2026	2
Oct 2026	2
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 100%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 100%
Reverse auction: 13%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Controls for Diagnostic Analyzers73/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Calibrators for Diagnostic Analyzers39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Biochemistry Reagent Kit for Human Samples39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Controls for Diagnostic Analyzers	73	2	7	—	—
2	Calibrators for Diagnostic Analyzers	39	0	2	—	—
3	Biochemistry Reagent Kit for Human Samples	39	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Controls for Diagnostic Analyzers100/100
2 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Controls for Diagnostic Analyzers	100	2	7	—	—

1
Indian Railways73/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Employees State Insuarnce Corporation60/100
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Health & Family Welfare Department Bihar60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Defence40/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Coal India Limited40/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Labour and Employment Department Tamil Nadu40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Indian Railways	73	0	3	—	—
2	Employees State Insuarnce Corporation	60	1	0	—	—
3	Health & Family Welfare Department Bihar	60	1	0	—	—
4	Department of Defence	40	0	1	—	—
5	Coal India Limited	40	0	1	—	—
6	Labour and Employment Department Tamil Nadu	40	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Railways73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Labour and Employment60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Defence40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Coal40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Ayush40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Railways	73	0	3	—	—
2	Ministry of Labour and Employment	60	1	0	—	—
3	Ministry of Defence	40	0	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Coal	40	0	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Ayush	40	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Chhattisgarh64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
75
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bihar60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Maharashtra40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Tamil Nadu40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Telangana40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	73	0	3	—	—
2	Chhattisgarh	64	1	1	—	—
3	Bihar	60	1	0	—	—
4	Maharashtra	40	0	1	—	—
5	Tamil Nadu	40	0	1	—	—
6	Telangana	40	0	1	—	—

1
Gorakhpur73/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Korba64/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
75
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Mumbai40/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Madurai40/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Hyderabad40/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Gorakhpur	73	0	3	—	—
2	Korba	64	1	1	—	—
3	Mumbai	40	0	1	—	—
4	Madurai	40	0	1	—	—
5	Hyderabad	40	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Controls for Diagnostic Analyzers: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor