Common Salt For Chemical Industries (V2) Conforming to IS 797: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Common Salt For Chemical Industries (V2) Conforming to IS 797 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 2
- Closed in period
- 29
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- 5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 6 |
| May 2026 | 3 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | 4 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 3 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 63%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 50%
- Reverse auction
- 3%
based on 30 bids
based on 2 bids
based on 30 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
2 live · 5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Common Salt For Chemical Industries (V2) Conforming to IS 797 | 73 | 2 | 29 | 5 | — |
| 2 | Wheat Bran as Livestock Feed Ingredient as per IS 2239 | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
2 live · 5 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Common Salt For Chemical Industries (V2) Conforming to IS 797 | 100 | 2 | 29 | 5 | — |
- 1Department of Space79/100
Department of Space ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 78
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Pmo ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Materials Management43/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Space | 79 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Defence Production | 78 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Defence | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Atomic Energy | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Military Affairs | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare) | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Materials Management | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Department of Defence Research & Development | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Health Research | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence78/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 78
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Department of Space72/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 67
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Pmo59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Coal39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ministry of Steel39/100
0 live · 5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Ministry of Power34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 78 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Space | 72 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Pmo | 59 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Coal | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Steel | 39 | 0 | 2 | 5 | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Power | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Gujarat82/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jharkhand82/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Himachal Pradesh78/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttar Pradesh78/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Karnataka58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Assam45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Maharashtra45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Punjab45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Tamil Nadu45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Madhya Pradesh38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gujarat | 82 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Jharkhand | 82 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Himachal Pradesh | 78 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttar Pradesh | 78 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Karnataka | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Assam | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Maharashtra | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Punjab | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Tamil Nadu | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Madhya Pradesh | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ahmedabad82/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kullu78/100
Himachal Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3East Singhbhum65/100
Jharkhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Bangalore58/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ghaziabad58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Dibrugarh45/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Bokaro45/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Mumbai45/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Cuddalore45/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Gautam Buddha Nagar45/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmedabad | 82 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Kullu | 78 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | East Singhbhum | 65 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Bangalore | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Ghaziabad | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Dibrugarh | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Bokaro | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Mumbai | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Cuddalore | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Gautam Buddha Nagar | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.