coat combat disruptive detachable lining: GeM business opportunity
Who buys coat combat disruptive detachable lining on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 30
- Awarded results
- 3
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹87 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 5.5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 5 |
| May 2026 | 6 |
| Jun 2026 | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 4 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 6 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 15%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 100%
- Reverse auction
- 4%
based on 27 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 26 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
1 live · 5.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹87 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 73
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | coat combat disruptive detachable lining | 83 | 1 | 30 | 5.5 | ₹87 lakh |
| 2 | Biomedical Waste Management Service - weight basis | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
1 live · 5.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹87 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 73
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | coat combat disruptive detachable lining | 81 | 1 | 30 | 5.5 | ₹87 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹87 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 48
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
- 2
Ministry of Home Affairs ·1 live · 13 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Indian Railways31/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 22
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 88 | 0 | 24 | 3 | ₹87 lakh |
| 2 | Central Armed Police Forces | 64 | 1 | 5 | 13 | — |
| 3 | Indian Railways | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence88/100
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹87 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 48
- Low competition
- 92
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
- 2Ministry of Home Affairs64/100
1 live · 13 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Railways31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 22
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 88 | 0 | 24 | 3 | ₹87 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 64 | 1 | 5 | 13 | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Railways | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Assam79/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Tamil Nadu59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttar Pradesh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Jammu & Kashmir56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Telangana43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Delhi37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Himachal Pradesh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Madhya Pradesh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Manipur37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assam | 79 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Maharashtra | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Tamil Nadu | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttar Pradesh | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Jammu & Kashmir | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Telangana | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Delhi | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Himachal Pradesh | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Madhya Pradesh | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Manipur | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Pune63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Cachar63/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Tiruvallur59/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Rajauri56/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Allahabad56/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Kamrup43/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Hyderabad43/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8New Delhi37/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Kangra37/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Indore37/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pune | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Cachar | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Tiruvallur | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Rajauri | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Allahabad | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Kamrup | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Hyderabad | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | New Delhi | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Kangra | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Indore | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
3 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 2 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.