CIPROFLOXACIN: GeM business opportunity
Who buys CIPROFLOXACIN on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 0
- Closed in period
- 58
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | 8 |
| May 2026 | 9 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 12 |
| Aug 2026 | 7 |
| Sept 2026 | 9 |
| Oct 2026 | 5 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 74%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- —
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 58 bids
based on 0 bids
based on 58 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1CIPROFLOXACIN73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2PARACETAMOL SYRUP50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Calamine Lotion (V2)43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4CLOTRIMAZOLE33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5ALBENDAZOLE33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Amoxycillin33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ceftriaxone33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8CEFEPIME33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9CEFIXIME33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10DOXYCYCLINE33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CIPROFLOXACIN | 73 | 0 | 58 | — | — |
| 2 | PARACETAMOL SYRUP | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Calamine Lotion (V2) | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | CLOTRIMAZOLE | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | ALBENDAZOLE | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Amoxycillin | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Ceftriaxone | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | CEFEPIME | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | CEFIXIME | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | DOXYCYCLINE | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1CIPROFLOXACIN100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Calamine Lotion (V2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CIPROFLOXACIN | 100 | 0 | 58 | — | — |
| 2 | Calamine Lotion (V2) | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 28
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 55
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Department of Defence44/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 68 | 0 | 34 | — | — |
| 2 | School Education & Literacy Development Department | 54 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department Jharkhand | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Health and Family Welfare Department Karnataka | 49 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Defence | 44 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare) | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Public Health and Family Welfare Department Maharashtra | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Health and Family Welfare | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 26
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Coal31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 68 | 0 | 37 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Coal | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Jharkhand70/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Karnataka63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Gujarat57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jammu & Kashmir53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Delhi51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Uttar Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Assam37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Haryana37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Kerala37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jharkhand | 70 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Karnataka | 63 | 0 | 16 | — | — |
| 3 | Gujarat | 57 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Jammu & Kashmir | 53 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 53 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 6 | Delhi | 51 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 7 | Uttar Pradesh | 50 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Assam | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Haryana | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Kerala | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Belgaum63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jamnagar60/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Koderma54/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Latehar54/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Central Delhi51/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Koppal51/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Pune51/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Lucknow51/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Panchkula40/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Hassan40/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belgaum | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 2 | Jamnagar | 60 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Koderma | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Latehar | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Central Delhi | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Koppal | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Pune | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Lucknow | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Panchkula | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Hassan | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.