Charging Station: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Charging Station on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 1Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 1
Closed in period: 8
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

0 Jun 2026

0 Jul 2026

33 Aug 2026

1 Sept 2026

3 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	0
Jul 2026	0
Aug 2026	3
Sept 2026	1
Oct 2026	3
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 78%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 100%
Reverse auction: 11%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Charging Station73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
HDMI Switcher34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Charging Station	73	1	8	—	—
2	HDMI Switcher	34	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Charging Station100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Charging Station	100	1	8	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs70/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
38
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Home Department Delhi56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Revenue36/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
National Institute of Disaster Management36/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	70	0	6	—	—
2	Home Department Delhi	56	1	0	—	—
3	Department of Revenue	36	0	1	—	—
4	National Institute of Disaster Management	36	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence70/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
38
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Home Affairs36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Finance36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	70	6	—	—
2	Ministry of Home Affairs	36	1	—	—
3	Ministry of Finance	36	1	—	—

1
Delhi78/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
75
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Madhya Pradesh69/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Uttarakhand49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Punjab40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Tamil Nadu40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Delhi	78	1	2	—	—
2	Madhya Pradesh	69	0	2	—	—
3	Uttarakhand	49	0	2	—	—
4	Punjab	40	0	1	—	—
5	Tamil Nadu	40	0	1	—	—

1
Sagar75/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
North Delhi64/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
North West Delhi44/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
South Delhi44/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Firozpur44/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Tiruchirappalli44/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Almora44/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Pithoragarh44/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Sagar	75	0	2	—	—
2	North Delhi	64	1	0	—	—
3	North West Delhi	44	0	1	—	—
4	South Delhi	44	0	1	—	—
5	Firozpur	44	0	1	—	—
6	Tiruchirappalli	44	0	1	—	—
7	Almora	44	0	1	—	—
8	Pithoragarh	44	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Charging Station: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor