Cattle Catcher Vehicle (V4): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Cattle Catcher Vehicle (V4) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 3
- Closed in period
- 88
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 14 |
| May 2026 | 16 |
| Jun 2026 | 14 |
| Jul 2026 | 8 |
| Aug 2026 | 13 |
| Sept 2026 | 15 |
| Oct 2026 | 7 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 3%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 33%
- Reverse auction
- 1%
based on 90 bids
based on 3 bids
based on 89 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Earthing Electrode30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cattle Catcher Vehicle (V4) | 72 | 3 | 88 | — | — |
| 2 | Submersible Pumpsets (Three Phase) Conforming To IS 8034 (V2) | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Earthing Electrode | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
3 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cattle Catcher Vehicle (V4) | 98 | 3 | 88 | — | — |
- 1
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 75
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Urban Local Bodies51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 69 | 1 | 19 | — | — |
| 2 | Urban Development & Housing Department Bihar | 64 | 0 | 10 | — | — |
| 3 | Rural Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 63 | 0 | 33 | — | — |
| 4 | Urban Development Department Chhattisgarh | 62 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Uttarpradesh State Rural Livelihood Mission | 55 | 0 | 13 | — | — |
| 6 | Animal Husbandry & Dairying Department Haryana | 54 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Urban Local Bodies | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Panchayat and Rural Development Department Chhattisgarh | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Local Government Department Punjab | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
Not enough data for this list yet.
- 1Uttar Pradesh66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 17
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Haryana62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bihar61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Chhattisgarh61/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 75
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Punjab42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gujarat33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 26
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Uttarakhand30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 66 | 1 | 66 | — | — |
| 2 | Haryana | 62 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Bihar | 61 | 0 | 10 | — | — |
| 4 | Chhattisgarh | 61 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Punjab | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Gujarat | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Uttarakhand | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Agra63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jalaun56/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bastar54/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Gurgaon54/100
Haryana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Basti54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Patna51/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Raipur51/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Ambala51/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Jaunpur51/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Lucknow46/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agra | 63 | 0 | 32 | — | — |
| 2 | Jalaun | 56 | 0 | 14 | — | — |
| 3 | Bastar | 54 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Gurgaon | 54 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Basti | 54 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Patna | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Raipur | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Ambala | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Jaunpur | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 10 | Lucknow | 46 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.