calibration Weights or Weights Sets: GeM business opportunity

Who buys calibration Weights or Weights Sets on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 20
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

0 May 2026

3 Jun 2026

88 Jul 2026

3 Aug 2026

4 Sept 2026

1 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	0
Jun 2026	3
Jul 2026	8
Aug 2026	3
Sept 2026	4
Oct 2026	1
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 50%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
calibration Weights or Weights Sets73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Calibration Gas42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Fully Automatic Biochemistry Analyzer (V2)42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Moisture analyser42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Delivery Bed (V2)42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Training Services42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	calibration Weights or Weights Sets	73	20	—	—
2	Calibration Gas	42	1	—	—
3	Fully Automatic Biochemistry Analyzer (V2)	42	1	—	—
4	Moisture analyser	42	1	—	—
5	Delivery Bed (V2)	42	1	—	—
6	Training Services	42	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
calibration Weights or Weights Sets100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	calibration Weights or Weights Sets	100	0	20	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs73/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Atomic Energy73/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence68/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (dsir)55/100
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Defence Research & Development48/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Indian Oil Corporation Limited48/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
India Meteorological Department (imd)48/100
Ministry of Earth Sciences ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Health and Family Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Environment Department Uttar Pradesh48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	73	4	—	—
2	Department of Atomic Energy	73	4	—	—
3	Department of Defence	68	3	—	—
4	Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (dsir)	55	2	—	—
5	Department of Defence Research & Development	48	1	—	—
6	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	48	1	—	—
7	India Meteorological Department (imd)	48	1	—	—
8	Health and Family Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir	48	1	—	—
9	Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited	48	1	—	—
10	Environment Department Uttar Pradesh	48	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Pmo64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Science and Technology50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Earth Sciences44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	73	8	—	—
2	Pmo	64	4	—	—
3	Ministry of Science and Technology	50	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	50	2	—	—
5	Ministry of Earth Sciences	44	1	—	—

1
Jammu & Kashmir73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Tamil Nadu69/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Andhra Pradesh47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Chandigarh47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Haryana47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Madhya Pradesh47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Rajasthan47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Telangana47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jammu & Kashmir	73	5	—	—
2	Tamil Nadu	69	4	—	—
3	Maharashtra	53	2	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	53	2	—	—
5	Andhra Pradesh	47	1	—	—
6	Chandigarh	47	1	—	—
7	Haryana	47	1	—	—
8	Madhya Pradesh	47	1	—	—
9	Rajasthan	47	1	—	—
10	Telangana	47	1	—	—

1
Doda65/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kargil65/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Chennai65/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Visakhapatnam54/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Chandigarh54/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Panipat54/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ananthnag54/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Bhopal54/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Mumbai54/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Pune54/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Doda	65	2	—	—
2	Kargil	65	2	—	—
3	Chennai	65	2	—	—
4	Visakhapatnam	54	1	—	—
5	Chandigarh	54	1	—	—
6	Panipat	54	1	—	—
7	Ananthnag	54	1	—	—
8	Bhopal	54	1	—	—
9	Mumbai	54	1	—	—
10	Pune	54	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

calibration Weights or Weights Sets: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor