12 Watt White-LED Based Solar Street Lighting System As Per MNRE Specification: GeM business opportunity
Who buys 12 Watt White-LED Based Solar Street Lighting System As Per MNRE Specification on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 50
- Closed in period
- 663
- Awarded results
- 37
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹5.5 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 6.3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 |
| Mar 2026 | 34 |
| Apr 2026 | 45 |
| May 2026 | 73 |
| Jun 2026 | 89 |
| Jul 2026 | 119 |
| Aug 2026 | 100 |
| Sept 2026 | 121 |
| Oct 2026 | 97 |
| Nov 2026 | 34 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 61%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 11%
- Reverse auction
- 3%
based on 663 bids
based on 47 bids
based on 660 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
50 live · 6.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 67
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value
- 100
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4White LED Based Solar Home Lighting System with Batten Type Luminary as per MNRE Specifications28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 11
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 Watt White-LED Based Solar Street Lighting System As Per MNRE Specification | 81 | 50 | 663 | 6.3 | ₹5.5 lakh |
| 2 | PVC Insulated Aluminium Cable Single Core and Multi Core Circular Sheathed with Rigid Conductor ISI Marked To IS 694 | 40 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Solar Water Heating System as per IS 12976:1990 | 30 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | White LED Based Solar Home Lighting System with Batten Type Luminary as per MNRE Specifications | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
50 live · 6.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 67
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PVC Insulated Aluminium Cable Single Core and Multi Core Circular Sheathed with Rigid Conductor ISI Marked To IS 694 | 100 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | 12 Watt White-LED Based Solar Street Lighting System As Per MNRE Specification | 76 | 50 | 663 | 6.3 | ₹5.5 lakh |
- 1
6 live · 6.4 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 94
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition
- 66
- Easy criteria
- 91
- Order value
- 100
- 2
17 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.9 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 68
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
8 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹10 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 88
- Momentum
- 73
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
2 live · 7 bidders avg · L1 ₹40 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 76
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 93
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹23 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 82
- Momentum
- 13
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 24
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rural Development and Panchayats Department Jammu and Kashmir | 80 | 6 | 93 | 6.4 | ₹5.3 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Panchayati Raj | 76 | 17 | 118 | 4 | ₹1.9 lakh |
| 3 | Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat | 73 | 8 | 65 | 6 | ₹10 lakh |
| 4 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 72 | 2 | 37 | 7 | ₹40 lakh |
| 5 | Rural Development Department Gujarat | 67 | 3 | 25 | — | — |
| 6 | General Administration Department Gujarat | 64 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 7 | Rural Development Department Uttarakhand | 62 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Tribal Development Department Gujarat | 61 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Rural Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 60 | 0 | 55 | 6 | ₹23 lakh |
| 10 | Rural Development Department | 58 | 2 | 27 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence65/100
0 live · 5.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹8.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 11
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Home Affairs61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Finance51/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ministry of Power31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Ministry of Mines31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 65 | 0 | 31 | 5.5 | ₹8.5 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 61 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Rural Development | 57 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Finance | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Power | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Mines | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Panchayati Raj | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Gujarat73/100
12 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 93
- Momentum
- 67
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Maharashtra72/100
21 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Jammu & Kashmir71/100
7 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 91
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttarakhand68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 51
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Uttar Pradesh67/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 44
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Odisha59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 47
- Momentum
- 64
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Bihar58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 82
- Momentum
- 5
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Madhya Pradesh57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 51
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 93
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Rajasthan55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 37
- Momentum
- 59
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Assam47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 47
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gujarat | 73 | 12 | 124 | — | — |
| 2 | Maharashtra | 72 | 21 | 177 | — | — |
| 3 | Jammu & Kashmir | 71 | 7 | 78 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttarakhand | 68 | 1 | 13 | — | — |
| 5 | Uttar Pradesh | 67 | 4 | 92 | — | — |
| 6 | Odisha | 59 | 1 | 10 | — | — |
| 7 | Bihar | 58 | 1 | 73 | — | — |
| 8 | Madhya Pradesh | 57 | 1 | 13 | — | — |
| 9 | Rajasthan | 55 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 10 | Assam | 47 | 0 | 11 | — | — |
- 1Pune76/100
Maharashtra ·9 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 96
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Udhampur74/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 61
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Dahod72/100
Gujarat ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 87
- Momentum
- 73
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 94
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ahmednagar70/100
Maharashtra ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 59
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Thane68/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 51
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Sangli67/100
Maharashtra ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 93
- Momentum
- 32
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7The Dangs67/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Banaskantha66/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Bharuch64/100
Gujarat ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Basti64/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 88
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 88
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pune | 76 | 9 | 41 | — | — |
| 2 | Udhampur | 74 | 2 | 56 | — | — |
| 3 | Dahod | 72 | 3 | 31 | — | — |
| 4 | Ahmednagar | 70 | 2 | 8 | — | — |
| 5 | Thane | 68 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 6 | Sangli | 67 | 4 | 40 | — | — |
| 7 | The Dangs | 67 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 8 | Banaskantha | 66 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 9 | Bharuch | 64 | 5 | 4 | — | — |
| 10 | Basti | 64 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 9 wins
- 6 wins
- 4 wins
- 3 wins
- 2 wins
- 2 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
17 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 12 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.